2010
DOI: 10.1080/01431160903140803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The multispectral separability of Costa Rican rainforest types with support vector machines and Random Forest decision trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a particular challenge in monsoon areas of Southeast Asia, where variation can be especially high among natural forest types in their physical structure and seasonal patterns of canopy cover [5]. Several studies have established that local floristic differences in tropical forest can be effectively mapped using medium-resolution multi-spectral imagery such as Landsat, typically in combination with topographic data [17][18][19][20][21]. However, increasing the variability within forest classes or the amount of spectral overlap between classes represents a considerable challenge to accurate discrimination of forest types [22].…”
Section: Mapping Of Forest Types and Degradation Extentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a particular challenge in monsoon areas of Southeast Asia, where variation can be especially high among natural forest types in their physical structure and seasonal patterns of canopy cover [5]. Several studies have established that local floristic differences in tropical forest can be effectively mapped using medium-resolution multi-spectral imagery such as Landsat, typically in combination with topographic data [17][18][19][20][21]. However, increasing the variability within forest classes or the amount of spectral overlap between classes represents a considerable challenge to accurate discrimination of forest types [22].…”
Section: Mapping Of Forest Types and Degradation Extentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spectral reflectance of tree plantations can be quite variable even within the same tree species, changing with plantation nutrition and disease status [57], degree of canopy disturbance [58], underlying soil type [59], and plantation age [52]. Tree plantation classification accuracy across landscapes is highly variable in the multispectral sensor literature, with frequent confusion between plantations and both secondary and mature forests, respectively [9,[60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RF classifiers are not as susceptible as individual classification trees to over-fitting or "overtraining" [35][36][37][38], and they are especially good at modeling nonlinearity and interactions among predictor variables [39]. RF classifiers have demonstrated higher predictive accuracy than more traditional classification methods in both ecology [39] and remote sensing [40], and have demonstrated comparable predictive accuracy to other machine-learning methods (e.g., support vector machines) [36,41]. In addition, RF models are relatively robust to error or noise in training datasets [35,37,42], making them particularly appealing for mitigating potential errors in stable site identification or assignment of class labels to stable sites.…”
Section: Random Forest Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%