2021
DOI: 10.22541/au.163638394.41572509/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The multiple states of environmental DNA and what is known about their persistence in aquatic environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microorganismal eDNA (from bacteria, archaea, algae, protozoa, and microscopic animals) can be present in either extracellular form or as intact, living organisms. For macroorganisms, such as fish, eDNA is generally extraorganismal (i.e., released from the organism into the environment), either as free‐floating or particle‐bound, extracellular molecules or contained in organelles (mitochondria or nuclei) or tissue and cellular debris (Mauvisseau et al, 2022; Pawlowski et al, 2018). The eDNA technique was developed over 20 years ago to analyse microbial communities found in environmental samples (Taberlet, Coissac, Hajibabaei, & Rieseberg, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microorganismal eDNA (from bacteria, archaea, algae, protozoa, and microscopic animals) can be present in either extracellular form or as intact, living organisms. For macroorganisms, such as fish, eDNA is generally extraorganismal (i.e., released from the organism into the environment), either as free‐floating or particle‐bound, extracellular molecules or contained in organelles (mitochondria or nuclei) or tissue and cellular debris (Mauvisseau et al, 2022; Pawlowski et al, 2018). The eDNA technique was developed over 20 years ago to analyse microbial communities found in environmental samples (Taberlet, Coissac, Hajibabaei, & Rieseberg, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our observations on eDNA persistence in the littoral zone of Geneva Lake are however to be extrapolated to other lakes with certain precautions since the persistence, degradation and transport of eDNA signals in water are influenced by many factors, such as eDNA characteristics, abiotic environmental factors and biotic factors (Harrison, Sunday and Rogers, 2019; Wang et al ., 2021). These complex mechanisms vary according to the species and environments studied, and divergent results have been obtained regarding eDNA degradation in freshwaters (Mauvisseau et al ., 2021), improving our understanding of eDNA persistence in the aquatic environment is clearly needed to help interpret future eDNA surveillance results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, to maximize detection, DNA isolated from all states (e.g. intracellular, dissolved, particle absorbed) could be utilized, by performing water filtration using different pore sizes as recommended by (Mauvisseau et al ., 2021). The persistence, degradation and transport of eDNA signals in lakes are complex mechanisms involving multiple biotic and abiotic factors, our understanding of these mechanisms is still limited and further study of how environmental parameters affect eDNA decay in aquatic environments is needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isolation of mitochondria can be done for example by differential centrifugation, which has been successfully applied as an enrichment step to avoid the biases arising from PCR on bulk samples of invertebrates, yet this has not yet been tested on eDNA samples (Zhou et al 2013). That said, current knowledge of the state of eDNA in different environmental conditions is sparse (Mauvisseau et al 2021), and isolation of full mitochondrial organelles may end up discarding a lot of dissolved or particle bound target DNA from an environmental sample. Bait capture methods on eDNA samples were tested to enrich target DNA, however it is likely the omission of amplification combined with the high dilution factor of target DNA in environmental samples led to reduced species detection rates when the bait capture approach was compared to more conventional PCR based metabarcoding (Wilcox et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%