Increased use of environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis for indirect species detection has spurred the need to understand eDNA persistence in the environment. Understanding the persistence of eDNA is complex because it exists in a mixture of different states (e.g., dissolved, particle adsorbed, intracellular, and intraorganellar), and each state is expected to have a specific decay rate that depends on environmental parameters. Thus, improving knowledge about eDNA conversion rates between states and the reactions that degrade eDNA in different states is needed. Here, we focus on eukaryotic extraorganismal eDNA, outline how water chemistry and suspended mineral particles likely affect conversion among each eDNA state, and indicate how environmental parameters affect persistence of states in the water column. On the basis of deducing these controlling parameters, we synthesized the eDNA literature to assess whether we could already derive a general understanding of eDNA states persisting in the environment. However, we found that these parameters are often not being measured or reported when measured, and in many cases very few experimental data exist from which to draw conclusions. Therefore, further study of how environmental parameters affect eDNA state conversion and eDNA decay in aquatic environments is needed. We recommend analytic controls that can be used during the processing of water to assess potential losses of different eDNA states if all were present in a water sample, and we outline future experimental work that would help determine the dominant eDNA states in water.

The European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) is a cryptic and poorly known fish species of high conservation concern. The species is experiencing dramatic population collapses across its native range to the point of regional extinction. Although environmental DNA (eDNA)‐based approaches offer clear advantages over conventional field methods for monitoring rare and endangered species, accurate detection and quantification remain difficult and quality assessment is often poorly incorporated. In this study, we developed and validated a novel digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) eDNA‐based method for reliable detection and quantification, which allows accurate monitoring of M. fossilis across a number of habitat types. A dilution experiment under laboratory conditions allowed the definition of the limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ), which were set at concentrations of 0.07 and 0.14 copies μl–1, respectively. A series of aquarium experiments revealed a significant and positive relationship between the number of individuals and the eDNA concentration measured. During a 3 year survey (2017–2019), we assessed 96 locations for the presence of M. fossilis in Flanders (Belgium). eDNA analyses on these samples highlighted 45% positive detections of the species. On the basis of the eDNA concentration per litre of water, only 12 sites appeared to harbour relatively dense populations. The other 31 sites gave a relatively weak positive signal that was typically situated below the LOQ. Combining sample‐specific estimates of effective DNA quantity (Qe) and conventional field sampling, we concluded that each of these weak positive sites still likely harboured the species and therefore they do not represent false positives. Further, only seven of the classified negative samples warrant additional sampling as our analyses identified a substantial risk of false‐negative detections (i.e., type II errors) at these locations. Finally, we illustrated that ddPCR outcompetes conventional qPCR analyses, especially when target DNA concentrations are critically low, which could be attributed to a reduced sensitivity of ddPCR to inhibition effects, higher sample concentrations being accommodated and higher sensitivity obtained.

Since the beginning of the last century, global species extinctions have occurred at unprecedented rates and currently over a million species are at risk (IPBES, 2019). Rapid transformations of natural ecosystems and habitat degradation highlight the urgent need for effective conservation strategies to mitigate further biodiversity losses. A prerequisite for the development of such strategies is the provision of comprehensive, reliable and frequently updated monitoring data, recording distribution changes of vulnerable, endangered and invasive species.A promising approach that is currently gaining momentum and fulfils such monitoring objectives relies on the detection of genetic traces left by organisms, also referred to as environmental DNA (or eDNA). Substantial advantages of eDNA-based methods are higher cost and time effectiveness compared to many traditional survey methods (Evans et al., 2017), their noninvasive nature (Cristescu & Hebert, 2018), and high specificity and sensitivity (Wilcox et al., 2013). However, eDNA-based methods have only been applied for about a decade in conservation management, and method reliability and accuracy are still being refined (Cristescu & Hebert, 2018).

In a recent paper, "Environmental DNA: What's behind the term? Clarifying the terminology and recommendations for its future use in biomonitoring," Pawlowski et al. argue that the term eDNA should be used to refer to the pool of DNA isolated from environmental samples, as opposed to only extra-organismal DNA from macro-organisms. We agree with this view. However, we are concerned that their proposed two-level terminology specifying sampling environment and targeted taxa is overly simplistic and might hinder rather than improve clear communication about environmental DNA and its use in biomonitoring. This terminology is based on categories that are often difficult to assign and uninformative, and it overlooks a fundamental distinction within eDNA: the type of DNA (organismal or extra-organismal) from which ecological interpretations are derived.This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.