2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.linged.2015.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The multimodal organization of speaker selection in classroom interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Delegated peer repair (Rehbein, 1984, as cited in Kasper, 1985), also known as teacher‐initiated peer repair (Seedhouse, 2004), is a specific type of pedagogical repair practice that implies the participation of the teacher and at least two students. Sequentially, it reveals a teacher's action of other‐selection for repair work in multiparty classroom interaction (Lauzon & Berger, 2015). This means that, in whole‐class interaction, Student A might establish a trouble source, for example, by asking the meaning of a word in the L2, and thus open a repair sequence, which can be self‐ or other‐initiated, with the aim for the teacher to repair it.…”
Section: Delegated Peer Repair In Classroom Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Delegated peer repair (Rehbein, 1984, as cited in Kasper, 1985), also known as teacher‐initiated peer repair (Seedhouse, 2004), is a specific type of pedagogical repair practice that implies the participation of the teacher and at least two students. Sequentially, it reveals a teacher's action of other‐selection for repair work in multiparty classroom interaction (Lauzon & Berger, 2015). This means that, in whole‐class interaction, Student A might establish a trouble source, for example, by asking the meaning of a word in the L2, and thus open a repair sequence, which can be self‐ or other‐initiated, with the aim for the teacher to repair it.…”
Section: Delegated Peer Repair In Classroom Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Kääntä (2012Kääntä ( , 2015 described teachers' employment of gaze, nodding, and pointing when allocating turns to students in whole-class interaction. Lauzon and Berger (2015) studied teachers' gestures used to nominate a student as a next speaker and the relevance of the students' embodied displays of (non)availability to respond. Sert (2019) analyzed teachers' embodied go-aheads after students' attempts to establish a mutual gaze.…”
Section: Teachers' Multimodal Resources and Student Participation In ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on classroom interaction has explored gaze as one of the many embodied resources systematically deployed for interaction. The focus has often been on the embodied conduct of teachers, who have been shown to allocate turns to students using gaze and other embodied resources (Kääntä 2012), to select next speakers based on whether students are gazing at them (Fasel Lauzon & Berger 2015), and to display a listener role during student discussions through gaze, gestures, and laughter, for instance (Willemsen et al 2019). Duran and Jacknick (2020) also show how a teacher uses multimodal resources, including gaze, to pursue response, and thus, to secure the progressivity of whole-class interaction.…”
Section: Gaze In Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This non-verbal communication established in the classroom reveals that the teacher does not have the absolute control of the interaction. Participation is rather a multimodal, interactional process between teachers and students (Fasel Lauzon & Berger, 2015;Kääntä, 2015).…”
Section: Students' Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%