The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.16986/huje.2018038799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learner Initiative in the Spanish as a Foreign Language Classroom: Implications for the Interactional Development

Abstract: Classroom interaction has been widely studied using the conversation analysis methodology in order to explore and understand interactional practices that enhance language learning. This research has been traditionally focused on the canonical teacher-student classroom interaction, called Initiation-Response-Feedback (IRF) sequence, composed by a teacher's first turn, a student's response and a third turn performed by the teacher to evaluate or give feedback. Variability within the IRF sequence, regarding the l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study highlighted the educational system challenges in Indonesian EFL classrooms, as there is a noticeable adherence to turntaking and sequencing patterns, which are mainly dictated by the teachers, resulting in students being silent, which hinders communication. These findings align with the study by Rodriguez and Wilstermann (2018), which indicates that EFL learners' commitment and linking their participation to turn-taking and sequencing limits interactive outcomes. Additionally, these outcomes are closely connected to the decisions made by the teacher.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The current study highlighted the educational system challenges in Indonesian EFL classrooms, as there is a noticeable adherence to turntaking and sequencing patterns, which are mainly dictated by the teachers, resulting in students being silent, which hinders communication. These findings align with the study by Rodriguez and Wilstermann (2018), which indicates that EFL learners' commitment and linking their participation to turn-taking and sequencing limits interactive outcomes. Additionally, these outcomes are closely connected to the decisions made by the teacher.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, students display their willingness to participate in repair work without being given the floor. Consequently, embodied delegated peer repair might also be considered an affordance to further nonelicited learner initiatives (Batlle & Murillo, 2018; Waring, 2011). Students’ participation without being allocated seems, therefore, to be sensitive to the historicity of classroom interaction (Koole & Berenst, 2008), so as teachers unfold delegated peer repair, students’ nonallocated peer repair becomes more common.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allowing learners to be active agents in co-constructing meanings by having teachers react appropriately to their attempts to initiate contributions and maintain the floor will likely expose learners to linguistic and interactional resources that support learning. Learners usually abide by the unspoken rules of classroom discourse and regard their participation as assigned by the teacher by means of particular turn-taking and sequence organization patterns they must learn and follow in such a way that the interactional outcomes are closely linked to the teacher's decisions (Rodriguez & Wilstermann, 2018). This may greatly reduce the opportunities for meaning negotiation and involvement that are available in the exchanges and may hinder the role of the teacher as a "facilitator" who can grant greater participation rights (Lee & Ng, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%