2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2011.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The MOXFQ patient-reported questionnaire: Assessment of data quality, reliability and validity in relation to foot and ankle surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
73
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
73
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending on the surgeon, either a transverse or a longitudinal incision was utilized and all patients underwent a partial release from the medial attachment; however, data regarding the extent of release were incomplete. All of these subjects were then contacted by mail and invited to complete 2 patient-reported outcome questionnaires: the Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) [8][9][10] and the Visual Analog Scale-Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA). 27,34 Both of these are validated scores for various foot and ankle conditions, and both of these scores are split into 3 separate components as well as a combined overall score.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the surgeon, either a transverse or a longitudinal incision was utilized and all patients underwent a partial release from the medial attachment; however, data regarding the extent of release were incomplete. All of these subjects were then contacted by mail and invited to complete 2 patient-reported outcome questionnaires: the Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) [8][9][10] and the Visual Analog Scale-Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA). 27,34 Both of these are validated scores for various foot and ankle conditions, and both of these scores are split into 3 separate components as well as a combined overall score.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MOXFQ has already been configured to a summary score (MOXFQ-index) [41]. This score has been validated specifically for hallux valgus surgery, and has good reliability and responsiveness [3,23,31,32,41,42]. The MCID was demonstrated by Dawson et al, for each different domain [23].…”
Section: Disease-specific Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This score is more sensitive than general health measures for quantifying hallux valgus surgery. There were no floor and ceiling effects in patients undergoing foot or ankle surgery (31.3% of this group underwent a non-specified method of hallux surgery) [ Table 1] [42].…”
Section: Disease-specific Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used the Manchester foot and disability questionnaire (MFDQ) as their reference for patients with hallux valgus, which resulted in developing the MOXFQ (3). After that, they enrolled 671 patients with different foot conditions seeking for surgical treatment and developed three domains of pain, walking/standing, and social interaction within this instrument (4)(5)(6). MOXFQ proved to be a reliable and valid patient-reported instrument with acceptable responsiveness in patients with foot and ankle conditions (5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%