2015
DOI: 10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Motivated Gatekeeper of Our Minds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 165 publications
(229 reference statements)
1
55
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Jost, Glaser, Kruglanski, and Sulloway (2003), people adopt ideological belief systems (in part) because they satisfy their deeper psychological needs and motives. Right-wing ideological beliefs, or conservative social beliefs about the ideal arrangement of society, thus stem from a basic cognitive intolerance and way of dealing with cognitive ambiguity (Roets, Kruglanski, Kossowska, Pierro, & Hong, 2015). Plenty of studies have demonstrated strong positive associations between NFC and the dimensions of right-wing attitudes (e.g., Dhont, Roets, & Van Hiel, 2013; Kossowska & Van Hiel, 2003; Onraet, Van Hiel, Roets, & Cornelis, 2011).…”
Section: Cognitive Style and Authoritarian Ideologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to Jost, Glaser, Kruglanski, and Sulloway (2003), people adopt ideological belief systems (in part) because they satisfy their deeper psychological needs and motives. Right-wing ideological beliefs, or conservative social beliefs about the ideal arrangement of society, thus stem from a basic cognitive intolerance and way of dealing with cognitive ambiguity (Roets, Kruglanski, Kossowska, Pierro, & Hong, 2015). Plenty of studies have demonstrated strong positive associations between NFC and the dimensions of right-wing attitudes (e.g., Dhont, Roets, & Van Hiel, 2013; Kossowska & Van Hiel, 2003; Onraet, Van Hiel, Roets, & Cornelis, 2011).…”
Section: Cognitive Style and Authoritarian Ideologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People high in SDO are likely to perceive the world as a competitive jungle, and are therefore inclined to maintain the status quo within the social hierarchy, and to react biased towards outgroups (e.g., Duckitt & Sibley, 2007; 2009; 2010). Adhering to this ideological belief system can thus also satisfy NFC, since the preservation of the societal status-quo and the placement of in- and outgroups on the ‘social-hierarchical ladder’ offers epistemic security (Roets et al, 2011a; 2015). Noteworthy, models testing NFC effects through SDO on prejudice generally showed weaker and less pronounced mediating effects (Roets et al, 2011a; 2015).…”
Section: Cognitive Style and Authoritarian Ideologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mimo odwołania siĊ powyĪej do wczesnych tekstów dotyczących teorii naiwnego poznania, podobne definicje i zastrzeĪenia znaleĨü moĪna w znacznie póĨniejszych pracach tego autora (np. Kruglanski, 2004;Kruglanski, Dechesne, Orehek i Pierro, 2009;Roets, Kruglanski, Kossowska, Pierro i Hong, 2015). Dowodzi to faktu, Īe moĪ-liwoĞü istnienia motywacji do unikniĊcia domkniĊcia jest konsekwentnie formułowanym postulatem teoretycznym.…”
Section: Formułowanie Teorii Naukowej Jako Analogia Nabywania Wiedzy unclassified
“…W konsekwencji odwołują siĊ do niej czĊsto badacze zajmujący siĊ miĊdzy innymi: podejmowaniem decyzji, uprzedzeniami, relacjami miĊdzygrupowymi, ekstremizmem czy zarządzaniem organizacjami (przegląd: Roets i in., 2015). Stosowanie tego podejĞcia w tak wielu obszarach Ğwiadczy o jego uĪytecznoĞci i trafnoĞci, wiąĪe siĊ jednak z ryzykiem nadmiernie uproszczonego rozumienia jego postulatów.…”
Section: Podsumowanieunclassified