2017
DOI: 10.1080/1120009x.2017.1291467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The most appropriate therapeutic strategy for acute lower respiratory tract infections: a Delphi-based approach

Abstract: Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) cause high morbidity and mortality worldwide. Empiric therapy often base the choice of antibiotic treatment on antibacterial spectrum of the agent rather than on its pharmacological properties or the pathogen resistance profile. Inappropriate prescribing leads to therapeutic failure and antibiotic resistance, with increasing direct and indirect health costs. A consensus on appropriate prescribing in LRTI therapy was appraised by this Delphi exercise, based on a panel … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The panellists were asked to anonymously express their level of agreement with each statement, using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = disagree; 2 = somewhat disagree; 3 = neither agree nor disagree; 4 = somewhat agree; 5 = agree). The use of a 5-point Likert Scale with this consensus threshold was defined a priori as described in previous studies with this modified process [29,[31][32][33][34]. Consensus was considered if either the sum of answers 1 and 2 (negative agreement), or 4 and 5 (positive agreement) exceeded 70%, as described in previous studies with this method [29,32,33,35].…”
Section: Delphi Process and Steering Committeementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The panellists were asked to anonymously express their level of agreement with each statement, using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = disagree; 2 = somewhat disagree; 3 = neither agree nor disagree; 4 = somewhat agree; 5 = agree). The use of a 5-point Likert Scale with this consensus threshold was defined a priori as described in previous studies with this modified process [29,[31][32][33][34]. Consensus was considered if either the sum of answers 1 and 2 (negative agreement), or 4 and 5 (positive agreement) exceeded 70%, as described in previous studies with this method [29,32,33,35].…”
Section: Delphi Process and Steering Committeementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the Delphi methodology to assess the consensus on the most appropriate strategy for acute LRTIs, 71% agreement was reached on the statement that empiric therapy with antibiotics characterized by a resistance profile above the 10–20% threshold and the non-protected β-lactams should be avoided [ 134 ]. This, together with the TOM probability study [ 132 ] points to discard macrolides as treatment considering their lack of PK/PD activity against H. influenzae , a pathogen potentially involved.…”
Section: The Role Of Cefditoren In the Treatment Of Lrtismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, together with the TOM probability study [ 132 ] points to discard macrolides as treatment considering their lack of PK/PD activity against H. influenzae , a pathogen potentially involved. Consensus (78% agreement) was also reached on the need to use antibiotics able to target emergent BLNAR and BLPACR isolates to prevent intra-species diffusion of resistant strains when treating AECB [ 134 ]. In vitro, cefditoren (in contrast to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid) demonstrated to counter intra-strain diffusion and spread of nonenzymatic resistance mechanisms ( fts I gene) in a pharmacodynamic simulation including several NTHi strains [ 82 ].…”
Section: The Role Of Cefditoren In the Treatment Of Lrtismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations