1994
DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199401000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of Data Quality, Scaling Assumptions, and Reliability Across Diverse Patient Groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

68
2,318
1
77

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4,009 publications
(2,521 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
68
2,318
1
77
Order By: Relevance
“…36 Scale internal consistency reliability was determined by calculating Cronbach coefficient alpha. 37 Scales with reliabilities of 0.70 or greater are recommended for comparing patient groups, whereas a reliability criterion of 0.90 is recommended for analyzing individual patient scale scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 Scale internal consistency reliability was determined by calculating Cronbach coefficient alpha. 37 Scales with reliabilities of 0.70 or greater are recommended for comparing patient groups, whereas a reliability criterion of 0.90 is recommended for analyzing individual patient scale scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general linear models (GLM) were used to evaluate the significance of interactions with factors while adjusting for sex, age and severity of cord injury. 17 A P-value of o0.05 was taken to indicate statistical significance, and post hoc tests were completed using Scheffe correction to control for the conduct of multiple tests. In addition, Spearman's correlation coefficients were computed to show the correlation between the King's health score and the SF-36 score in patients with SCI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aghajanzadeh et al [17] compared physical function scores from the medical outcomes study 36 short form health survey [34] with the national average (although further details were lacking) and showed these were significantly decreased. Although the symptom definitions were inconsistent between the studies, all reported high frequencies of gastrointestinal symptoms that persisted across all time points assessed.…”
Section: Relationship Between Nutritional Factors and Quality Of Lifementioning
confidence: 99%