1984
DOI: 10.1097/00043764-198410000-00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mortality of Ontario Undertakers and a Review of Formaldehyde-Related Mortality Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Risk did not vary for the embalmers by length of time since first exposure (47,48), but it did for the anatomists (49). Among the industrial workers, the CRR was 1.1 for lung cancer for the shorter latency group and 1.2 for the longer latenc y group .…”
Section: Summary Of Epidemiologic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk did not vary for the embalmers by length of time since first exposure (47,48), but it did for the anatomists (49). Among the industrial workers, the CRR was 1.1 for lung cancer for the shorter latency group and 1.2 for the longer latenc y group .…”
Section: Summary Of Epidemiologic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in a case-referent study of lung cancer among Danish physicians, no association was observed between formaldehyde exposure and employment in pathology, forensic medicine, or anatomy (12). A standardized mortality ratio study of Ontario undertakers (15) provided no indications of elevated cancer mortality. In the case-referent study of lung cancer among formaldehyde-exposed employees of Du Pont chemical plants in the United States, no association with formaldehyde exposure was found (6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The epidemiologic studies published on cancer risk among workers exposed to formaldehyde have been inconclusi ve so far (I, 2,4,6,8,9,10,II,12,15,16,18,19,21,22,23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tindings from several previous epidemiologic studies of workers exposed to formaldehyde have been reported [Acheson et al, 1984;Harrington and Shannon, 1975;Harrington and Oakes;1984, Levine et al, 1984Liebling et al, 1983;Marsh, 1982;Walrath and Fraumeni, 1983;Walrath and Fraumeni, 1984;Blair et al, 1986;and Stroup, 19841. None of these investigations has detected an excess of nasal cancer, although the statistical power of these studies to detect this rare form of cancer was extremely low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%