The moral ecology of markets: on the failure of the amoral defense of markets

Abstract

Many economists have defended capitalism; most have tried to do so within the self-imposed methodological constraint that economists should employ only empirical arguments, not normative ones. This essay examines three classic amoral defenses of capitalism—by Milton Friedman, James Buchanan, and Friedrich Hayek—and argues that each fails on its own terms, since each implicitly incorporates moral presumptions essential to the author's argument. Constructively, the essay proposes that no one can adequately endorse (or critique) markets without making a moral evaluation of their context—their “moral ecology.” Four issues are identified as necessarily addressed in every adequate evaluation of markets. The essay does not endorse any one position on these elements, but argues instead that seemingly incommensurable standpoints on markets—ranging from Marxist to libertarian—actually represent positions on the these four basic issues.markets, morality, capitalism, Milton Friedman, James Buchanan, Friedrich Hayek,

Market Therapy? On Intervention in the Consociation with Non‐members

“…Consequently, markets have been popular targets of interventions throughout the history of the concept. The dominant view is that market interventions correct market failures (McKee, ; Finn, ; Valentinov, ; Valentinov, ; Cohen, ; Valentinov et al, ). The definition of market failures, however, implies the idea of an ideal market (Grit and Dolfsma, ; MacKenzie, ; Esposito, ; Chester, ).…”

Eliminating Poverty and Hunger in Developing Countries: A Moral Imperative or Enlightened Self-Interest?

“…In the context of minimum wages, Finn (2003) suggests that a 'moral consensus that holds society together requires a prosperous nation to guarantee a minimal standard of living to all full-time workers, even if that necessitates a more extensive (and expensive) social safety net for the unemployed.' Could a similar argument be made for poverty and hunger for a prosperous world, in which an international moral consensus would hold the world together, i.e., promote economic growth, social justice, peace, stability, and the absence of terrorism?…”