The Moral Dilemma in Fashion: Using the Prisoner’s Dilemma Game on Animals and the Environment

Choi, Yeong-Hyeon; Han, Saram

doi:10.1080/1362704x.2022.2118671

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 58 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As a basis for reasoning in analyzing individual and citizen behavior, PD has potential to be applied to address the actual problem in various fields. Several scholars applied PD in sustainability issues such as inequality issues of climate change [71][72][73]; climate change [1,30,74]; addressing ethical consumption issues in vegan fashion brands [75]; collective action in COVID-19 [72,76]; the framework of analyzing climate negotiation [77]; nature-based tourism management [54]. Trends in applying the PD to real environmental and NRM issues indicate that PD will continue to be a framework for analyzing and formulating solutions for competitive and conflicting human interactions.…”

Section: Future Research and Directionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Indonesia’s Renewable Natural Resource Management in the Low-Carbon Transition: A Conundrum in Changing Trajectories

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A paradigm shift is required to transform current natural resource management (NRM) in Indonesia’s decision to move into low-carbon development to achieve the greenhouse gas emission target. No study has been conducted to assess whether or not the current approaches are reliable in anticipating the conundrum of the new juncture. We reviewed 10 cases of NRM practices in Indonesia from 2019–2023 collected from the Scopus dataset by integrating the prisoner’s dilemma approach into the socio-ecological framework to analyze the practices and the anticipated gaps. Our finding revealed that socio-economic governance is the dominant view in interpreting the competition between personal and collective interests in NRM. Seeing NRM as an allocation problem and the excessive use of the legal normative approach in interpreting and addressing the problem are flaws in the approach. Combining the prisoner’s dilemma approach with the socio-ecological governance framework enabled us to address the flaws. Promoting polycentric governance that accommodates social trust, reciprocities, and socio-ecological beliefs and reduces uncertainties about ownership and the resources necessary to reduce defective behavior is a solution to transform the structure of the competition. Revising the socio-economic payoff into a socio-ecological value-oriented institution is the strategy to address the conundrum.

show abstract