The Moore Method and the Constructivist Theory of Learning: Was R. L. Moore a Constructivist?

Abstract

Constructivism is currently a hotly debated topic, with proponents and opponents equally adamant and emotional with respect to their viewpoints. Many misconceptions exist on both sides of the debate, and misuses of terminology and attribution are rampant. Constructivism is a theory of learning, not a particular approach to instruction and not a curriculum. Proponents, the majority of whom are involved in K-12 education, argue that reaching more students with a deeper understanding of mathematics requires an appreciation of how knowledge is constructed and an instructional approach that more fully acknowledges the students' roles as active participants in the classroom instruction, rather than the lecture method which has worked well for some but poorly for others. The opponents, many of whom are mathematicians, tend to equate constructivism with "discovery" learning and deem it as inefficient at best, and tolerating inaccurate mathematics at worst. However, many mathematicians, including those who criticize constructivism, revere R. L. Moore as an outstanding teacher of mathematics. The Moore Method and the Modified Moore Method are frequently cited [2] as exemplary in the literature on teaching undergraduate-and graduate-level mathematics. An analysis of his method of teaching, however, indicates adherence to a theory of learning which he did not necessarily articulate, and might even have disputed. The goal of this article is to show that Moore's method aligned with a constructivist approach.

Empathetic Design: A Sustainable Approach to School Change

“…Constructing meaning as derived from experience (Barrett & Long, 2012;Mishra, 2014) was evident in school blogs and reinforced during interviews. School leaders commented on pace and structure of the day noting the discomfort of extended sitting, restricted movement, challenges of transition, and lack of snacks and drinks.…”

“…Zygmuntís (2016) research study reinforced the importance of sharing experiences and information through discourse leading to a rise in consciousness and understanding within a bounded culture. Along with social cultural theory is the concept of constructivism where meaning is constructed through an experience (Barrett & Long, 2012;Mishra, 2014). El-Deghaidyís (2012) study focused on the importance of constructivism from the perspective of teachersí as researchers; however, the findings can be applied to school leaders who take an active role in constructing knowledge through personal experiences within the school culture.…”

Google Classroom as a Pedagogical Tool for Research Supervision: A Case Study of Undergraduate Students’ Perceptions and Experiences

“…Constructivist learning theory is the key theoretical lens utilized in this study to explain the findings. Constructivism is a theory of learning, not a method of instruction or a curriculum (Barrett & Long, 2012). The view of constructivism as a learning theory has guided most of the development of constructivist pedagogy (Richardson, 2003(Richardson, , p. 1624.…”

Implementation of Individualized Educational Plan and Its Challenges in Ngala Secondary School for the Deaf, Nakuru County, Kenya

“…This theory applies to this study in that the students with hearing impairment are identified, assessed and placed in special schools for the deaf so that their academic needs are met. An IEP is to be developed by the teachers who are the curriculum implementers by finding out the learner's strengths and weaknesses and then coming up with short-term and long-term objectives with specified evaluation procedures (Barrett & Long, 2012). Teachers play a major role in education for the deaf since they should have adequate training, a positive attitude, good communication skills with learners with deafness and appropriate pedagogical practices that will enable them to provide individualized curricular instructions that yield good academic results.…”