2019
DOI: 10.1126/science.aav7958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The MOOC pivot

Abstract: When massive open online courses (MOOCs) first captured global attention in 2012, advocates imagined a disruptive transformation in postsecondary education. Video lectures from the world's best professors could be broadcast to the farthest reaches of the networked world, and students could demonstrate proficiency using innovative computer-graded assessments, even in places with limited access to traditional education. But after promising a reordering of higher education, we see the field instead coalescing aro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
197
1
8

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 327 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
6
197
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Percentage of courses explored and completed by cohort and course category of attrition. This trend, consistent with other recent MOOC studies [18], exemplifies a challenge that MOOC providers have in retaining learners year after year.…”
Section: Substantive Subheadsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Percentage of courses explored and completed by cohort and course category of attrition. This trend, consistent with other recent MOOC studies [18], exemplifies a challenge that MOOC providers have in retaining learners year after year.…”
Section: Substantive Subheadsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These statistics are more alarming in a study conducted by EDX, only 17% of registered learners have consulted the courses and 8% have a certificate that validates the end of MOOCs (Hennessy, 2016). Recently, another study from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology sets the warning bell ringing (Reich & Ruipérez-Valiente, 2019), in this study, on a total of 12.67 million registrations in free online EdX courses by 5.63 million learners from 2012 to 2018, only 6% of online course participants were able to complete their training in 2013-2014, compared to 3.13% last year. Even among participants who paid for "audited" courses, 46% completed the courses in 2017-2018 compared to 56% in 2016-2017.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The use of advanced technology made it possible to scale up and reach massive amounts of users, potentially bringing (free) education within arm's reach for anyone with an Internet connection. However, almost seven years later, MOOCs have only partially fulfilled their potential, as they manage to draw in large numbers of users, but also see the majority of them dropping out [1]. Based on an analysis of "565 course iterations from 261 different courses, with a combined 12.67 million course registrations from 5.63 million learners" [1, p. 130], it appears that the majority of people who enrol in a MOOC never enter the course (52% of the study sample), and those who do join, are mainly active during the first two weeks, after which their level of activities drops sharply [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, almost seven years later, MOOCs have only partially fulfilled their potential, as they manage to draw in large numbers of users, but also see the majority of them dropping out [1]. Based on an analysis of "565 course iterations from 261 different courses, with a combined 12.67 million course registrations from 5.63 million learners" [1, p. 130], it appears that the majority of people who enrol in a MOOC never enter the course (52% of the study sample), and those who do join, are mainly active during the first two weeks, after which their level of activities drops sharply [1]. We argue that a drop in activity levels may be partly due to a lack of user engagement, and MOOCs may benefit from a gamified intervention targeted at increasing engagement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%