2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2003.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The molecular deposition of transgenically modified starch in the starch granule as imaged by functional microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
126
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
10
126
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Birefringence patterns on starch showed molecular order and composition of starch. Strong birefringence pattern indicated to high structural regularity of the amylopectin, whereas weak contrast back grown of birefringence showed that the starch had higher amylose content [23] that can be seen in yam (Fig. 1A).…”
Section: A Starch Granule Morphologymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Birefringence patterns on starch showed molecular order and composition of starch. Strong birefringence pattern indicated to high structural regularity of the amylopectin, whereas weak contrast back grown of birefringence showed that the starch had higher amylose content [23] that can be seen in yam (Fig. 1A).…”
Section: A Starch Granule Morphologymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is because amylose has a lower molecular weight than amylopectin and contains a much higher mole ratio of reducing ends per anhydrous glucose residues, resulting in a higher by-weight labeling of amylose [39].…”
Section: Morphological Changes Of High-amylose Starch After Hydrothermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken together, we propose that a sufficient amount of phosphate esters existed in amylopectin which may act as identifiers to distinguish amylopectin chains from amylose chains, which prevents the erroneous interactions between amylose and amylopectin segments and keeps the normal assembly of starch granules. This model confirms the hypothesis proposed by Blennow et al (2002Blennow et al ( & 2003.…”
Section: Phosphate Esters May Act As Identifiers Of Amylose and Amylosupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Suppression of starch phosphorylation by knock-down or knock-out of GWDs leads to starch excess phenotypes in leaves and cold-sweetening inhibition in potato tubers, indicating the essential role of starch phosphorylation in starch-degrading machinery (Blennow et al, 2003;Kozlov et al, 2007;Lorberth et al, 1998;Mahlow et al, 2014;Yu et al, 2001b). In our study, the association between starch phosphorylation and starch degradation was reflected in the simultaneous change in transcript level of GWDs and that of other degrading genes (Chapters 3, 4 and 6), which re-enforces the effect of starch phosphorylation on starch degradation.…”
Section: Starch Phosphorylation An Indispensable Piece For Starch Mementioning
confidence: 99%