2014
DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The molecular background of mucinous carcinoma beyond MUC2

Abstract: The increasing interest of the oncology community in tumour classification and prediction of outcome to targeted therapies has put emphasis on an improved identification of tumour types. Colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma (MC) is a subtype that is characterized by the presence of abundant extracellular mucin that comprises at least 50% of the tumour volume and is found in 10–15% of colorectal cancer patients. MC development is poorly understood, however, the distinct clinical and pathological presentation of M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
62
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 162 publications
2
62
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Mucinous CRC have higher rates of MSI 25 and lower rates of TP53 mutation than adenocarcinoma, 26 and they also demonstrate higher expression of HATH1 27 and MUC2. 28 KRAS mutation may 29 or may not 26 be related to mucinous differentiation in CRC. Some of these associations are important from a prognostic and therapeutic perspective, as MSI-high status confers improved survival in mCRC 25 and may qualify a patient for anti-PD-1 therapy, 30 and tumours with a KRAS mutation are not eligible for treatment with EGFR inhibitors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mucinous CRC have higher rates of MSI 25 and lower rates of TP53 mutation than adenocarcinoma, 26 and they also demonstrate higher expression of HATH1 27 and MUC2. 28 KRAS mutation may 29 or may not 26 be related to mucinous differentiation in CRC. Some of these associations are important from a prognostic and therapeutic perspective, as MSI-high status confers improved survival in mCRC 25 and may qualify a patient for anti-PD-1 therapy, 30 and tumours with a KRAS mutation are not eligible for treatment with EGFR inhibitors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MUC5B, MUC6, MUC14, MUC16, and MUC18 were the genes that were implicated although one cannot be sure if the increased rate of SSMs in these genes accounts for the end result which is the production of mucin and resistance to chemoradiotherapy in this histological subtype, further studies looking at gene expression data may prove to be more useful to determine the molecular alterations behind mucinous histology. 32 Mucinous tumors had more alteration in the cell cycle, the RTK-RAS, and the TGF-β pathways compared with non-mucinous tumors which had more alterations in the TP53 pathway. Interestingly, more CNA gain was found in the ARRDC and the RICTOR genes in the mucinous cohort, both of these genes play a role in cancer growth and progression as well as cell Stratifying patients in this way may be important when determining treatment and prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Cancer cells have many aberrant transcripts of DNMT3B, which is linked to E -cadherin promoter gene methylation and CRC aggressiveness ( Brambert et al, 2015 ). Moreover, DNMT3B overexpression was frequently associated with LINE-1 hypermethylation, high-grade histology with many features of combined high MSI, CIMP and BRAF V600E mutation and increased KRAS and wild-type p53 expressions ( Hugen et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNMT3B causes hypermethylation of promoter CpG-rich regions in a variety of malignancies ( Yun et al, 2012 ) and repress transcription in either methylation-dependent manner ( Linhart et al, 2007 ; Nosho et al, 2009 ) or through their histone deacetylase activity ( Fuks et al, 2001 ). Moreover, DNMT3B overexpression was frequently associated with LINE-1 hypermethylation, high-grade histology with many features of combined high MSI, CIMP and BRAF V600E mutation and increased KRAS and wild-type p53 expressions ( Hugen et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%