1983
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1119(83)90131-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mitochondrial genomes of spontaneous orir petite mutants of yeast have rearranged repeat units organized as inverted tandem dimers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An even more complex situation may prevail in the spontaneous oriT petites (and in many of the ethidium bromideinduced petites), where repeat units are arranged as short inverted tandem dimers. In this case Faugeron-Fonty et al, 1983), we know from the very low suppressivity of oriT petites (<50o) that replication is extremely poor, since oriT genomes are competed out by wildtype genomes. Problems here might arise from the production of long transcripts starting at sequence r of the ori sequence in petites, but not in wild-type cells (see below), or from secondary structures formed between subsequent inverted repeats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An even more complex situation may prevail in the spontaneous oriT petites (and in many of the ethidium bromideinduced petites), where repeat units are arranged as short inverted tandem dimers. In this case Faugeron-Fonty et al, 1983), we know from the very low suppressivity of oriT petites (<50o) that replication is extremely poor, since oriT genomes are competed out by wildtype genomes. Problems here might arise from the production of long transcripts starting at sequence r of the ori sequence in petites, but not in wild-type cells (see below), or from secondary structures formed between subsequent inverted repeats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hints of the structures that we are describing as "mixed" structures have been commented on previously in ethidium bromide treated Petites (Locker et al, 1974;Locker et al, 1979) and spontaneous Petites (Heyting et al, 1979;Bos et al, 1980;Faugeron-Fonty et al, 1983). The first proposal of a model for the generation of these structures was provided in (Bos et al, 1980), but was subsequently refuted in (Faugeron-Fonty et al, 1983) where the claim was that these were larger ranging periodic structures produced by an unknown mechanism. However, our evidence of partially repeated units in Figure 5d, where two alignments are repeated with the same orientation but separated by an inverted alignment, precludes the structure proposed in (Faugeron-Fonty et al, 1983) and is evidence that adds to and is consistent with (Bos et al, 1980).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Here we also provide direct evidence for intramolecular and intermolecular heterogeneity in reporting "mixed" non-periodic structures in the mtDNA of yeast. Hints of the structures that we are describing as "mixed" structures have been commented on previously in ethidium bromide treated Petites (Locker et al, 1974;Locker et al, 1979) and spontaneous Petites (Heyting et al, 1979;Bos et al, 1980;Faugeron-Fonty et al, 1983). The first proposal of a model for the generation of these structures was provided in (Bos et al, 1980), but was subsequently refuted in (Faugeron-Fonty et al, 1983) where the claim was that these were larger ranging periodic structures produced by an unknown mechanism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations