“…The populist governments (understood in terms of Laclau, 2005) of the early 2000s (also called "neodevelopmentalist," "twenty-first-century socialist," or "national and popular") attempted to modify the institutional bases of Latin American capitalism with more inclusive models through the return of state economic intervention (Munck, 2015). After the failure of neoliberalism in the region during the 1990s, the state strategy of "national development" (Ebenau, 2014) sought to strengthen coalitions supported by union (Etchemendy, 2011), social (Forni, 2020;Oliveira and Dowbor, 2020), and business organizations capable of and interested in mobilizing resources-in particular, the national business class that depended on the internal market. In contrast, multinationals not aligned with the "national interest" (Ebenau, 2014) were at a disadvantage vis-à-vis the state.…”