The mirror effect: influence of national governance on environmental disclosure in coordinated economies

Abstract

Purpose Based on the approach of the varieties of capitalism, this paper aims to investigate the influence of national governance characteristics on environmental disclosure. Design/methodology/approach This research analyzed companies based in coordinated economies, i.e. 1,815 companies from Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, The Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain and Sweden were investigated for the period 2009–2018. The authors created an index to measure environmental disclosure, and national governance was measured using the United Nations governance indicators. Findings The findings show that countries with greater transparency, democracy, citizen participation and government effectiveness tend to have companies with a greater environmental concern. The results allow us to conclude that the responsible behavior of companies is a mirror of the governance environment of the country where they operate. The findings have managerial implications. Practical implications Firms must be aware that institutional factors can influence their business. In institutional structures with low government effectiveness, little confidence in social rules and high levels of corruption, corporations tend to be less ethical. Originality/value This research used the varieties of capitalism approach to explain companies’ environmental disclosure. This is a recent approach to the institutional theory, and little explored in previous studies. Institutional level variables, such as governance indicators, can be used in other studies that analyze the relationship between institutional environment and corporate disclosure.

Environmental taxation: Contribution to sustainable development and AI prospects

“…It strengthens the evidence base that economic tools, such as environmental taxation, could make (in practice) a significant contribution to the environmental protection and development of the environmental economy. The paper has advanced our understanding on the previous work on the existing theories of the environmental economy (Nita, 2019;Adebayo et al, 2022;Borojo et al, 2022;Hassan et al, 2022;Nita et al, 2022;Nwani et al, 2022;Pinheiro et al, 2022;Rani et al, 2022), proving the existence of a close direct connection between the collection of environmental taxes, protection of ecosystems and preservation of biodiversity.…”

The effects of national culture on environmental disclosure: A cross-country analysis

“…The dependent variable is the environmental disclosure of companies. To measure this environmental disclosure, we created an environmental performance index, which was developed based on the model from Gamerschlag et al (2011) and Pinheiro et al (2022). In our index, we select the categories of environmental disclosure, according to Gamerschlag et al (2011): recycled, energy consumption, biodiversity, emissions, effluents and water, waste, spills, and environmental impacts.…”

The impact of corporate governance attributes on environmental and social performance: The case of European region excluding companies from the Eurozone

“…Gross domestic product (GDP) and foreign direct investments (FDI) are critical factors for the development of CSR, as these are expected to have a positive impact on CSR performance (Carini et al, 2017; Khaled et al, 2021; Sharma & Sathish, 2022). Furthermore, a national corruption index is used in this study since corruption is a critical determinant of governance and accountability that could affect CSR performance (Pinheiro et al, 2022). The definitions and measurements of all variables employed in the proposed model are summarized in Table 1.…”