2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2008.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Miocene Gangdese porphyry copper belt generated during post-collisional extension in the Tibetan Orogen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
113
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 329 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
3
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is supported by the systematic older zircon U-Pb ages (16.4 ± 0.4-17.7 ± 0.3 Ma) of Qulong adakitic samples so far studied than the Re-Os isochron ages (15.36±0.21-16.41 ± 0.48 Ma) ( Fig. 13; Hou et al, 2009;Li and Rui, 2004;Meng et al, 2003b;Rui et al, 2003). However, Qin et al (2014) analyzed zircons from ore-bearing adakitic monzogranite porphyry and obtained the age of 15.3 ± 0.6 Ma, which is identical to the Re-Os isochron ages within error, and these adakites may be the most likely 'ore-forming adakites'.…”
Section: Qulong Adakites and The Porphyry Cu Depositmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This is supported by the systematic older zircon U-Pb ages (16.4 ± 0.4-17.7 ± 0.3 Ma) of Qulong adakitic samples so far studied than the Re-Os isochron ages (15.36±0.21-16.41 ± 0.48 Ma) ( Fig. 13; Hou et al, 2009;Li and Rui, 2004;Meng et al, 2003b;Rui et al, 2003). However, Qin et al (2014) analyzed zircons from ore-bearing adakitic monzogranite porphyry and obtained the age of 15.3 ± 0.6 Ma, which is identical to the Re-Os isochron ages within error, and these adakites may be the most likely 'ore-forming adakites'.…”
Section: Qulong Adakites and The Porphyry Cu Depositmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The complex evolutionary history of this orogenic belt is not yet well understood (e.g., Boulin, 1991;Sorkhabi and Heydari, 2008;Tommasini et al, 2011;Lu et al, 2012;Zhang and Santosh, 2012;Goldfarb et al, 2013;Lai et al, 2013a,b;Zheng et al, 2013;Zhu et al, 2013). Intrusive and volcanic rocks are widely distributed in the belt, and are often accompanied by a diverse range of mineral deposits, including porphyry Cu and Cu-Au (e.g., Hou et al, 2004Hou et al, , 2007Hou et al, , 2009Hou et al, , 2011Li et al, 2011;Xia et al, 2011;Lu et al, 2012;Richards et al, 2012;Goldfarb et al, 2013;Kamvong et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2013). In eastern Tibet, there were two main periods of porphyry Cu mineralization: Late Triassic (e.g., the Pulang porphyry Cu deposit), corresponding to the closure of the Paleo-Tethys Ocean; and Early Tertiary (e.g., the Yulong porphyry Cu deposit), corresponding to continental collision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, porphyry Mo and Mo-Cu deposits in Eastern Transbaikalia occurred in a fashion similar to porphyry Cu-Mo deposits from the Tibet-Himalayas and North-China craton-Yangtze collision zones [14,18]. In contrast to magmatic belts in the Altai-Sayan segment and Northern Mongolia, the Mesozoic magmatic belt in Eastern Transbaikalia is located in a region underlain with the Precambrian basement.…”
Section: Eastern Transbaikaliamentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The porphyry series at the Zhireken deposit include rocks of two types: (1) porphyries with adakite-like geochemical signatures and (2) porphyries with typical arc-like characteristics (Y > 18 ppm, Yb > 1.18 ppm, and Sr/Y < 30) with a relatively low Mg# (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) and Eu/Eu* ratio (0.35-0.40). Adakite-like rocks are characterized by elevated K 2 O contents and K 2 O/Na 2 O ratio of~1.…”
Section: Granitoid Rocksmentioning
confidence: 99%