The Minimally Invasive Treatments for Benign Prostrate Hyperplasia

Abstract

The prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) increases with age, affecting more than 50% of men above the age of 50 to varying degrees. As it enlarges, it compresses onto the urethra causing bladder outlet obstruction. This can cause a spectrum of problems ranging from irritative and obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) to retention of urine with obstructive uropathy. Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) is the standard for surgical intervention, however with the advent of an ageing population, there is an increasing number of patients who have ischaemic heart disease who require long-term anticoagulation and have multiple co-morbidities that put them at an increased risk of general anaesthesia. This review aims to critically appraise the effectiveness and evidence for use of these minimally invasive techniques.Both PubMed and Ovid were used to search for randomised control trials (RCT) comparing the various minimally invasive techniques against TURP. In cases where there were no RCTs, the results of the respective trial were compiled. This was later compiled in a summary table.An effective minimally invasive treatment modality will play a complimentary role to TURP which remains the standard of surgical treatment for BPH. Technologies progressing towards rapid re-creation of prostatic channel, minimal blood loss and non-urethral instrumentation will bridge the divide between pharmacotherapy and surgery.

In the Spirit of Medical and Scientific Publication

“…Tha and Ng aim to educate readers on pitfalls in the interpretation of coagulation tests and addresses the blind spot of bleeding disorders in the context of normal coagulation screen 1 . For surgery, there are scholarly reviews on surgery for parotid neoplasia 2 and minimally invasive treatments for benign prostate hyperplasia 3 . For emergency medicine, there is a review of haematological emergencies 4 .…”