2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2016.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mimetic finite difference method for the Landau–Lifshitz equation

Abstract: The Landau-Lifshitz equation describes the dynamics of the magnetization inside ferromagnetic materials. This equation is highly nonlinear and has a non-convex constraint (the magnitude of the magnetization is constant) which pose interesting challenges in developing numerical methods. We develop and analyze explicit and implicit mimetic finite difference schemes for this equation. These schemes work on general polytopal meshes which provide enormous flexibility to model magnetic devices with various shapes. A… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method is also shown to be useful for meshes with degenerate and nonconvex polygonal elements. Since then, MFD method has been implemented in various problems (diffusion/convection-diffusion [101][102][103][104], electromagnetic field problems [105,106], elasticity problems, Lagrangian hydrodynamics problems [107], and solving wave equations [108]) and for modelling fluid flows [109,110]. MFD has been extended to higher order [100,102] and also to 3D [102,105,111,112].…”
Section: Mimetic Finite Difference (Mfd) Methods and Virtualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method is also shown to be useful for meshes with degenerate and nonconvex polygonal elements. Since then, MFD method has been implemented in various problems (diffusion/convection-diffusion [101][102][103][104], electromagnetic field problems [105,106], elasticity problems, Lagrangian hydrodynamics problems [107], and solving wave equations [108]) and for modelling fluid flows [109,110]. MFD has been extended to higher order [100,102] and also to 3D [102,105,111,112].…”
Section: Mimetic Finite Difference (Mfd) Methods and Virtualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a continuous progress of developing numerical algorithms in the past few decades; see for example [6,7] and references therein. The spatial derivative is typically approximated by the finite element method (FEM) [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] and the finite difference method [19,20,21,22,23]. As for the temporal discretization, explicit schemes [15,24], fully implicit schemes [25,26,20], and semi-implicit schemes [19,27,28,29,30,31,32] have been extensively studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, a nonlinear solver is necessary at each time step, and the same step-size condition has to be imposed. The existing works of finite difference method to the LL equation may be referred to [18,19,23,26,44]. In [18], a time stepping method in the form of a projection method was proposed; this method is implicit and unconditionally stable, and the rigorous proof was provided with the first-order accuracy in time and second-order accuracy in space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [23], an updated source term was used, and an iteration algorithm was repeatedly performed until the numerical solution converges. In [26], the explicit and implicit mimetic finite difference algorithm was developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%