2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/5792372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Brief Review on Polygonal/Polyhedral Finite Element Methods

Abstract: This paper provides brief review on polygonal/polyhedral finite elements. Various techniques, together with their advantages and disadvantages, are listed. A comparison of various techniques with the recently proposed Virtual Node Polyhedral Element (VPHE) is also provided. This review would help the readers to understand the various techniques used in formation of polygonal/polyhedral finite elements.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 181 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we have to keep in mind that other polygonal/polyhedral element formulations based on, e.g., the Voronoi cell finite element method (VCFEM) [25,29], the virtual element method (VEM) [30,31] and the scaled boundary finite element method (SBFEM) [32][33][34], are also possible. An extensive description of these and other related approaches can be found in the review article by Perumal [35]. The main challenges of the polytopal FEM can be seen in the lack of commercial and free mesh generation software, construction of appropriate (high-order) interpolants and in the need for accurate numerical integration schemes.…”
Section: Polytopal Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we have to keep in mind that other polygonal/polyhedral element formulations based on, e.g., the Voronoi cell finite element method (VCFEM) [25,29], the virtual element method (VEM) [30,31] and the scaled boundary finite element method (SBFEM) [32][33][34], are also possible. An extensive description of these and other related approaches can be found in the review article by Perumal [35]. The main challenges of the polytopal FEM can be seen in the lack of commercial and free mesh generation software, construction of appropriate (high-order) interpolants and in the need for accurate numerical integration schemes.…”
Section: Polytopal Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2D Mixed meshes composed of triangles and quadrilaterals have also been used, but are not so common as the previous ones [32]. Other numerical methods such as the Voronoi Cell Finite Element Method (VCFEM) [33] and Polygonal Finite Element method (PFEM) [34] use the constrained Voronoi diagram as the polygonal mesh, where the Voronoi cells are the mesh elements [35][36][37].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FEM traditionally uses tetrahedral or hexahedral meshes (in 3D). However, FEM has recently been successfully generalized to meshes of convex polyhedrons, which has brought about significant advantages [17][18][19][20]. Their applications also extend to computer graphics [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%