The Militarization of Mass Incapacitation and Torture during the Sunni Insurgency and American Occupation of Iraq

Abstract

While scholars and journalists have focused important attention on the recent militarization of intensive policing and imprisonment policies in the United States, there is little reciprocal recognition of how militarized versions of these policies were also exported for use in the occupation of Iraq. Intensive policing and imprisonment enabled the American-led and Shia-dominated Iraq Ministries of Defense and Interior along with U.S. forces to play significant roles in the ethnic cleansing and displacement of Arab Sunnis from Baghdad neighborhoods, and in their disproportionate detention in military-and militia-operated facilities, of which the Abu Ghraib prison is only the best known. The failure of American authorities alone and working with Iraq's government to intervene in stopping the use of police and prisons as places of torture is a violation of U.N.-invoked and U.S.-ratified treaties, and thereby subject to prosecution. Such prosecutions have imported into international law the concept of "joint criminal enterprise" anticipated by the criminologist Donald Cressey and incorporated in the American Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) statutes used to convict organized criminals. We elaborate how the concept of joint criminal enterprise can be used to understand and possibly prosecute a chain of command responsibility for the use of policing and prisons as sites of torture in Iraq. We analyze the previously neglected international consequences of U.S. policing, prison, and mass incapacitation strategies with links to American criminology.Keywords: crime; violence; population; war "The message is becoming loud and clear: criminal organizations should be dealt with as organizations, not merely as collections of individual criminals, and any 'attack' on them must deal with organizational structures and the social contexts in which the structures thrive." Donald Cressey [1]

International Law and American Criminology: Lessons of Racist Torture and Reparations from Geneva to Chicago

“…A few foot soldiers were punished for the abuses at Abu Ghraib but not their superiors, and certainly not those whose orders encouraged the abuses." This summation is consistent with our own assessment, both in Iraq (Hagan and Hanson 2016) and beyond. But as Abel documents, there is more to this story, and it suggests that the interplay of social activism and international law can sometimes bring unexpected victories that are more consequential than commonly realized, and that should be of considerable interest to criminologists.…”

“…And the war in Iraq remained a crime of aggression that was only passively acknowledged by American politicians or American criminologists. These massive crimes still beg for increased criminological attention (Hagan and Hanson 2016).…”

Kebijakan Pemerintah terhadap Pengalihan Pengelolaan Lembaga Pemasyarakatan kepada Perusahaan Privat (Studi Kasus Negara Amerika Serikat)

“…Berbagai kendala lain yang dihadapi oleh negara bagian Amerika Serikat ialah perihal kapasitas penjara yang terlalu penuh oleh tahanan (over capacity) sehingga pengawasan maupun perawatan lembaga pemasyarakatan tidak dapat dikelola dengan baik (Hagan & Hanson, 2016).…”

In the shadow of 9/11: How the study of political extremism has reshaped criminology*

“…And of course, these countries are not a random sample but strongly over‐represent Europe and North America while under‐representing countries of Africa, the Middle East, and Asia. Hagan (2021; Hagan & Greer, 2002; Hagan & Hanson, 2016) pointed out that a major consequence of this insular approach is that mainstream criminology has generally ignored a wide range of international lawbreaking, including war crimes, genocide, mass incarceration, and torture.…”