1988
DOI: 10.1057/jors.1988.160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Metamodel in Simulation Analysis: Can It Be Trusted?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meta models are taking a role as objective function in optimization process considering system boundaries [2,11,15]. Madu [22] presented major benefits of meta-modeling.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta models are taking a role as objective function in optimization process considering system boundaries [2,11,15]. Madu [22] presented major benefits of meta-modeling.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameter values of the chosen experimental factors are varied according to the method selected and the performance monitored (this usually means evaluating one or more KPI values or a function of KPIs) in order to locate particularly good (or bad) combinations (scenarios) and/or to improve understanding of how the factors influence performance (Robinson, 2004). Formal methods can be statistically based, such as experimental design (Box et al, 1978;Kleijnen et al, 2005), MM (Friedman and Pressman, 1988), or more mathematically or computationally based such as SO algorithms (Fu, 2002). Informal methods usually involve some kind of personal judgement on the part of the modeller and/or client and may resemble a more ad hoc version of one of the formal methods mentioned.…”
Section: Theory and Benefits Of Des Search Experimentation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of metamodelling include model simpli®cation, enhanced exploration and interpretation of the model, generalization to other models of the same type, sensitivity analysis, optimization, answering to inverse questions and better understanding of the studied system and the interrelationships of design variables (Friedman and Pressman 1988).…”
Section: Post-metamodelling Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%