2017
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.160036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The metabolic costs of sexual signalling in the chirping katydidPlangia graminea(Serville) (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) are context dependent: cumulative costs add up fast

Abstract: Katydids produce acoustic signals via stridulation, which they use to attract conspecific females for mating. However, direct estimates of the metabolic costs of calling to date have produced diverse cost estimates and are limited to only a handful of insect species. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the metabolic cost of calling in an unstudied sub-Saharan katydid, Using wild-caught animals, we measured katydid metabolic rate using standard flow-through respirometry while simultaneously recording the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experiments have also shown that investment in calling, investment in searching and sex-role reversal can be flexible and both density and resourcedependent (Bateman 2001;Gwynne 1985;1990). Given how little sound the species in our study produce compared to other katydid species (ter Hofstede et al 2020), energy expended during calling would be minimal compared to the high energetic expenditures associated with spermatophore production and flight (Doubell et al 2017;Stevens and Josephson 1977). Therefore, we suggest that energetic constraints are unlikely to be the primary factor driving the tradeoff relationships seen in our study.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experiments have also shown that investment in calling, investment in searching and sex-role reversal can be flexible and both density and resourcedependent (Bateman 2001;Gwynne 1985;1990). Given how little sound the species in our study produce compared to other katydid species (ter Hofstede et al 2020), energy expended during calling would be minimal compared to the high energetic expenditures associated with spermatophore production and flight (Doubell et al 2017;Stevens and Josephson 1977). Therefore, we suggest that energetic constraints are unlikely to be the primary factor driving the tradeoff relationships seen in our study.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Most studies of energetics of calling in orthopteran insects have been on species that call multiple times per second for long periods of time (Hoback and Wagner 1997;Prestwich 1994). Both within and across tested species, there is a clear positive relationship between call rate and metabolic rate (Doubell et al 2017;Prestwich 1994). Interestingly, Hoback and Wagner (1997) found that the metabolic rate of crickets increased with call rate, but not the duration of the call.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calls may play an important role in mate choice by acting as indicators of male quality ( Alexander 1967 ), since call-production is a highly energetically demanding activity ( Prestwich and Walker 1981 ; Taigen and Wells 1985 ; Gerhardt and Huber 2002 ). Studies of mate choice in acoustic insects have shown that female preferences for male acoustic features are focused on all features requiring larger energy expenditure, such as calling for longer and louder, or calling at higher rates ( Doubell et al 2017 ; Erregger et al 2017 ). In our study, we show that males of P .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of gryllids and tettigoniids have shown that producing a calling song is energetically costly. For example, in the katydid Plangia graminea, metabolic rate during singing is 60% higher than resting metabolic rate (Doubell et al, 2017). In Mecopoda sp.…”
Section: The Energetic Costs Of Singingmentioning
confidence: 98%