2022
DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoac007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The best of both worlds: cicada males change costly signals to achieve mates while females choose a mate based on both calling and courtship songs

Abstract: Cicadas usually sing and mate in the higher parts of trees. Studies addressing the effects of different acoustic signals on mate choice in Cicadidae are very limited. We investigated the effects of both acoustical features and morphological traits on mate choice in an East Asian cicada Platypleura kaempferi. Males produce high-rate calling songs that attract females, then produce low-rate courtship songs to secure mating when a female is attracted. Higher calling song rate, shorter single pulse duration and sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…
Hisses, clicks, chirps, trills, rattles and buzzes-insects produce diverse sounds to convey information to their receivers. Their aim varies: some seek mates through audible sexual displays (Hou et al, 2022), others scare away intruders via acoustical warning signals (Dowdy & Conner, 2016). Predators and ectoparasites can detect insect prey following the sounds they produce (Tomás & Soler, 2016) and even plants react to noisy pollinators (Veits et al, 2019).
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
Hisses, clicks, chirps, trills, rattles and buzzes-insects produce diverse sounds to convey information to their receivers. Their aim varies: some seek mates through audible sexual displays (Hou et al, 2022), others scare away intruders via acoustical warning signals (Dowdy & Conner, 2016). Predators and ectoparasites can detect insect prey following the sounds they produce (Tomás & Soler, 2016) and even plants react to noisy pollinators (Veits et al, 2019).
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%