A B S T R A C TThis article analyzes the specific pragmatics of an extremely asymmetrical example of market interaction between Spanish-speaking middlemen Mestizos and Hñahñu (Otomi) occasional sellers in the market of Ixmiquilpan, in the state of Hidalgo, Mexico, where Hñahñu is still spoken. The fine indications of interpersonal cross-cultural conflict found in the transcript (e.g., duration of turns, varied use of indexical terms by buyers to address sellers, and the timing of verbal performance) allow us to understand how interethnic, gender, and power differences operate in this specific setting, relating the global and local levels. Detailed analysis of one case demonstrates the validity of certain universal theories regarding the use of language and enables us to understand the unavoidable conditions of conversation in terms of their universal status vis-à-vis the use of language as the material expression of power, or symbolic violence (Hñahñu, markets, communication universals, cooperative principle, power, Mexico.)*
I N T R O D U C T I O NThis article presents evidence derived from market interactions in a context of interethnic conflict to support the idea that language constitutes, in principle, an open means for human communication and emancipation, even when specific power arrangements of symbolic violence (Bourdieu 1979(Bourdieu , 1994 counteract this presumably universal assumption (Habermas 1987). To this end, I will outline the political economy of indigenous markets in Mexico, especially in the context of Hñahñu 1 markets; I will then analyze an extreme case of asymmetric interethnic face-to-face interaction, in Spanish, between a Mestizo 2 professional middleman and a female Hñahñu occasional seller in markets of the region of El Mezquital, in Hidalgo, Mexico. As we will see, such an interaction represents a general pattern of Mestizos "talking down" to Indians in Mexico, especially in this region and specifically in the context of these markets. The main claim that this article advances is that even when an extreme power differential is strongly evident in this type of conversation, the general nature of discourse -in terms of the universal conditions that provide the very possibility of communication