1996
DOI: 10.1159/000117297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mental Deterioration Battery: Normative Data, Diagnostic Reliability and Qualitative Analyses of Cognitive Impairment

Abstract: This study aimed at investigating the clinical usefulness of the Mental Deterioration Battery (MDB) in the neuropsychological diagnosis and characterization of the dementia syndrome. In this paper, we report: (a) normative data for various test scores derived from the analysis of performance of 340 normal subjects living in urban areas; (b) an evaluation of the reliability of the single tests and of the battery as a whole in differentiating normal subjects from patients affected by cognitive deterioration deri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
728
2
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,089 publications
(741 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
728
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A detailed neuropsychological battery (1 h length) was used to investigate specific cognitive domains, such as memory (Rey's word list immediate and delayed recall) (21), abstract thinking (Raven matrices) (22) and verbal fluency (letter and category fluency) (23), known to be specifically affected in people carrying the APOE ε4 allele.…”
Section: Neuropsychological Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed neuropsychological battery (1 h length) was used to investigate specific cognitive domains, such as memory (Rey's word list immediate and delayed recall) (21), abstract thinking (Raven matrices) (22) and verbal fluency (letter and category fluency) (23), known to be specifically affected in people carrying the APOE ε4 allele.…”
Section: Neuropsychological Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients underwent: (i) semi-structured interview with the patient and -whenever possible -with another informant (usually the patient's spouse or a child) by a geriatrician or neurologist; (ii) physical and neurological examinations; (iii) performance-based tests of physical function, gait and balance; (iv) neuropsychological assessment evaluating verbal and non-verbal memory, attention and executive functions (Trail Making Test B-A; Clock Drawing Test; Amodio et al, 2002;Shulman, 2000), abstract thinking (Raven matrices; Basso et al, 1987), frontal functions (Inverted Motor Learning; Spinnler and Tognoni, 1987); language (Phonological and Semantic fluency; Token test; Carlesimo et al, 1996;Novelli et al, 1986), and apraxia and visuo-constructional abilities (Rey figure copy; Caffarra et al, 2002); (v) assessment of depressive symptoms with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D; Radloff, 1977). As the aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of the vascular damage on EEG rhythms, we did not consider the clinical subtype of MCI, i.e., amnesic, non-amnesic or multiple domains.…”
Section: Diagnostic Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) executive function: verbal fluency (Carlesimo, Caltagirone & Gainotti, 1996), trail making B-A (Giovagnoli et al, 1996), cognitive estimates (Della Sala, MacPherson, Phillips, Sacco & Spinnler, 2003), (iii) visuospatial attention: star cancellation (Wilson, Cockburn & Halligan, 1987) and (iv) processing speed: trail making A (Giovagnoli et al, 1996). All patients presented with clear evidence of the classical amnesic syndrome characterized by intact immediate verbal recall, as assessed via forward digit span (Carlesimo et al, 1996) but severely impaired LTM, as assessed via word list learning (i.e.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients presented with clear evidence of the classical amnesic syndrome characterized by intact immediate verbal recall, as assessed via forward digit span (Carlesimo et al, 1996) but severely impaired LTM, as assessed via word list learning (i.e. total immediate word recall across 5 trials), delayed word recall and delayed prose recall (Carlesimo et al, 1996), and corroborated by the patients' carers' ratings on the Clinical Dementia Rating -Everyday Memory Deficits Scale (Katz, Ford, Mokowitz, Jackson & Jaffe, 1963).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%