2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The membrane biofilm reactor (MBfR) for water and wastewater treatment: Principles, applications, and recent developments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
172
1
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 305 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
2
172
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…They are based on the transfer of a gaseous electron donor or acceptor across a hydrophobic membrane (Ivanovic and Leiknes, 2012;Nerenberg, 2016) and have only recently been use as a commercial product, which is not established within the nutrient removal market (Martin and Nerenberg, 2012). MABRs behave differently to conventional biofilms due to the presence of gas exchange, adding a layer of complexity to the treatment process (Martin and Nerenberg, 2012). They have been successfully commercialized for N removal and recent studies report total Premoval of up to 90% when used with an SBR (Sun et al, 2015).…”
Section: Novel and Potential Ebpr Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are based on the transfer of a gaseous electron donor or acceptor across a hydrophobic membrane (Ivanovic and Leiknes, 2012;Nerenberg, 2016) and have only recently been use as a commercial product, which is not established within the nutrient removal market (Martin and Nerenberg, 2012). MABRs behave differently to conventional biofilms due to the presence of gas exchange, adding a layer of complexity to the treatment process (Martin and Nerenberg, 2012). They have been successfully commercialized for N removal and recent studies report total Premoval of up to 90% when used with an SBR (Sun et al, 2015).…”
Section: Novel and Potential Ebpr Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, compared to their planktonic counterparts, biofilms have been reported to be more tolerant to harsh physicochemical conditions as generated by various toxic contaminants or biocides (1,4). Because of these advantages, biofilms have been increasingly applied to the efficient removal of toxic contaminants from industrial wastewater (5)(6)(7)(8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total time, from placement of the biofilm in the flow cell until the end of testing of the biofilm section, was less than 3 h. MBfR applications are promising biofilm-based technologies where biofilm management sets important challenges for the performance of the system (e.g. biofilm start-up times, optimal biofilm thickness, detachment control) [34]. Biofilm effective viscosity was determined by shear rheometry using a parallel plate rotational rheometer rsif.royalsocietypublishing.org J. R. Soc.…”
Section: Experiments To Test the Mechanical Properties Of Biofilmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we assessed how different shear stress conditions affect biofilm detachment. For this purpose, we used biofilms obtained from a mixed culture membrane biofilm reactor (MBfR) [34]. Biofilm samples were obtained from a 250-ml MBfR, inoculated with activated sludge from a local wastewater treatment plant.…”
Section: Experiments To Test the Mechanical Properties Of Biofilmsmentioning
confidence: 99%