The mediating role of social capital in the relationship between socioeconomic status and adolescent wellbeing: evidence from Ghana

Abstract

Background: Social capital is generally portrayed to be protective of adolescents' health and wellbeing against the effects of socioeconomic inequalities. However, few empirical evidence exist on this protective role of social capital regarding adolescents' wellbeing in the low-and middle-income country (LMIC) context. This study examines the potential for social capital to be a protective health resource by investigating whether social capital can mediate the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and wellbeing of Ghanaian adolescents. It also examines how SES and social capital relate to different dimensions of adolescents' wellbeing in different social contexts. Methods: The study employed a cross-sectional survey involving a randomly selected 2068 adolescents (13-18 years) from 15 schools (8 Senior and 7 Junior High Schools) in Ghana. Relationships were assessed using multivariate regression models. Results: Three measures of familial social capital (family sense of belonging, family autonomy support, and family control) were found to be important protective factors of both adolescents' life satisfaction and happiness against the effects of socioeconomic status. One measure of school social capital (school sense of belonging) was found to augment adolescents' wellbeing but played no mediating role in the SES-wellbeing relationship. A proportion of about 69 and 42% of the total effect of SES on happiness and life satisfaction were mediated by social capital respectively. Moreover, there were variations in how SES and social capital related to the different dimensions of adolescents' wellbeing. Conclusion: Social capital is a significant mechanism through which SES impacts the wellbeing of adolescents. Social capital is a potential protective health resource that can be utilised by public health policy to promote adolescents' wellbeing irrespective of socioeconomic inequalities. Moreover, the role of the family (home) in promoting adolescents' wellbeing is superior to that of school which prompts targeted policy interventions. For a holistic assessment of adolescents' subjective wellbeing, both life evaluations (life satisfaction) and positive emotions (happiness) should be assessed concomitantly.

Determinants of life satisfaction and self-rated health in Iranian children and adolescents: A structure equation model

“…In consistence with our ndings, recent studies have shown that satisfaction at school has positive effect on students' satisfaction with life by decreasing both the school drop-out rate and disruptive behaviors (24,25). School satisfaction was shown to reduce the students' illness, raising positive emotions, life satisfaction and academic success (26). On average, subjects who have higher social contact, take part in physical activities, spend more time with family and friends seem to have greater satisfaction with life (5).…”

The association between ozone and fine particles and mental health-related emergency department visits in California, 2005–2013

“…Previous studies have also found significant associations between air pollutants and several of these mental health outcomes [ 12 , 31 – 35 ]. However, our findings on the association between O 3 exposure and bipolar disorder is especially novel.…”

“…In contrast to other criteria air pollutants, several studies found increased risks for all mental health, schizophrenia, self-harm/suicide, and depression in colder seasons, particularly for PM 2.5 and larger fine particles [ 9 , 14 , 15 , 32 , 34 , 48 ]. However, a recent study found increased risks of self-harm/suicide during both warm and cold season, with no evidence of statistical interaction [ 31 ]. One study also found stronger associations between particulate pollutants (PM 10 ) and violent suicidal outcomes in colder months but not for non-violent suicidal outcomes.…”

COVID-19: A Comparative Study of Population Aggregation Patterns in the Central Urban Area of Tianjin, China

“…There are many factors influencing the urban population distribution, such as the quality of the built environment [ 33 , 34 ], public service conveniences [ 35 , 36 ], traffic accessibility [ 37 , 38 , 39 ], spatial ecological quality [ 40 , 41 ], and others [ 42 , 43 ]. There is spatial heterogeneity within each factor and traditional linear regression models have not been fitted well in previous studies [ 44 , 45 ], so we used a GWR model to figure out the population distribution mechanism.…”