2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2017.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mediating role of cognitive ability on the relationship between motor proficiency and early academic achievement in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies (86%) examining these variables reported findings from participants in pre-kindergarten to year 2, with only three (11%) studies [43,44,45] reporting findings from participants in high school. A total of 19 (65%) studies [21,40,44,48,49,52,53,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66] used standardized assessment tools to measure both fine motor proficiency and academic performance in mathematics. Of the 29 studies that examined these variables, 12 (41%) [40,48,51,54,56,57,59,64,65,66,67,68] were categorized as having ‘good’ methodological quality, 10 (34%) [44,49,52,55,58,60,61,62,69,70] were categorized as having ‘fair’ methodological quality, and seven (24%) [21,43,45,53,63,71,72] were categorized as having ‘poor’ methodological quality.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Most studies (86%) examining these variables reported findings from participants in pre-kindergarten to year 2, with only three (11%) studies [43,44,45] reporting findings from participants in high school. A total of 19 (65%) studies [21,40,44,48,49,52,53,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66] used standardized assessment tools to measure both fine motor proficiency and academic performance in mathematics. Of the 29 studies that examined these variables, 12 (41%) [40,48,51,54,56,57,59,64,65,66,67,68] were categorized as having ‘good’ methodological quality, 10 (34%) [44,49,52,55,58,60,61,62,69,70] were categorized as having ‘fair’ methodological quality, and seven (24%) [21,43,45,53,63,71,72] were categorized as having ‘poor’ methodological quality.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a total of three studies [45,54,61] with poor to good methodological quality reported significant associations between total motor proficiency (a combination of fine and gross motor scores) and academic performance in mathematics using the BOT-2 (Short Form) to assess total motor proficiency. Significant positive correlations reported were found to be weak (r = 0.21–0.23).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations