The media of sociology: tight or loose translations?

Abstract

Abstract:Sociologists have increasingly come to recognize that the discipline has unduly privileged textual representations, but efforts to incorporate visual and other media are still only in their beginning. This paper develops an analysis of the ways objects of knowledge are translated into other media, in order to understand the visual practices of sociology and to point out unused possibilities. I argue that the discourse on visual sociology, by assuming that photographs are less objective than text, is based on an asymmetric mediadeterminism and on a misleading notion of objectivity. Instead, I suggest to analyze media with the concept of translations. I introduce several kinds of translations, most centrally the distinction between tight and loose ones. I show that many sciences, such as biology, focus on tight translations, using a variety of media and manipulating both research objects and representations. Sociology, in contrast, uses both tight and loose translations, but uses the latter only for texts. For visuals, sociology restricts itself to what I call "the documentary": focusing on mechanical recording technologies without manipulating either the object of research or the representation. I conclude by discussing three rare examples of what is largely excluded in sociology: visual loose translations, visual tight translations based on non-mechanical recording technologies, and visual tight translations based on mechanical recording technologies that include the manipulation of both object and representation.

On Sociological Reflexivity

“…There have long been calls for a serious sociology of sociology and a serious history of sociology (Calhoun 2007;Fleck 1999;Daye and Moebius 2015;Turner and Turner 1990), and the sociology of sociology is now a strong field of its own. This conversation also has borrowed from scholars engaged in social studies of the natural sciences (Knorr Cetina 1981b;Lynch and Bogen 1997;Woolgar 1988), resulting in a range of social studies of the social sciences (e.g., Camic, Gross, and Lamont 2011;Deville, Guggenheim, and Hrdličková 2016;Gieryn 2006;Guggenheim 2015;Kohler 2019;Lezaun 2007;Lezaun and Calvillo 2013;Michael 2004).…”

How to use ANT in inventive ways so that its critique will not run out of steam?

“…At its core is the following problem: ANT (rhetorically) dislikes what I have called loose translations (Guggenheim 2015). Loose translations are translation steps that make big jumps, for example from one medium to another, or from one kind of argument to another.…”

Drawing as Radical Multimodality: Salvaging Patrick Geddes's Material Methodology

“…Drawing, like writing, is a craft that can be learned (Edwards ). Although scholars continue to theorize without doing (for example, Guggenheim ), those of us who have stepped out of the customary academic keyboard “hunch” are finding how our “looking” has changed (Causey ; Morgan Centre ). The practice of drawing makes us vulnerable; it changes our habitus as embodied, reflexive researchers and rebalances power relations between the “expert” and the research participant.…”