2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2008.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mechanisms of value transfer in design meetings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While Hutchins's and Nersessian's contextual investigations discussed above were ethnographic in nature (Hutchins 1995, Nersessian et al 2003a,b, Nersessian 2006, the analysis presented here uses data from a study of two architectural meetings and builds upon an earlier analysis of these meetings that focused on the role values play in the design discourse (Le Dantec and Do 2009). Both design meetings were video recorded from several angles, providing wide views of wholegroup dynamics that enabled analysis of gesture and body language, as well as a topdown view of the table that permitted the observation of drawings, sketches and tools that were used during the meeting.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While Hutchins's and Nersessian's contextual investigations discussed above were ethnographic in nature (Hutchins 1995, Nersessian et al 2003a,b, Nersessian 2006, the analysis presented here uses data from a study of two architectural meetings and builds upon an earlier analysis of these meetings that focused on the role values play in the design discourse (Le Dantec and Do 2009). Both design meetings were video recorded from several angles, providing wide views of wholegroup dynamics that enabled analysis of gesture and body language, as well as a topdown view of the table that permitted the observation of drawings, sketches and tools that were used during the meeting.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over a roughly similar time period, design researchers have moved away from the designer as an individual font of creativity (Lawson 1990, Rowe 1995, to designer as social member in a collaborative endeavour (Brereton et al 1996, Cross and Cross 1996, Le Dantec and Do 2009). Brereton in particular pointed out the role of social negotiation in the design process and attributed how well the design functions to the success with which the team was able to negotiate the collaborative design process (Brereton et al 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, Grounded Theory has been used to study multidisciplinary design processes in several design disciplines (Jagodzinski et al 2000;Lee and Cassidy 2007;Le Dantec and Do, 2009;Geber and Carroll 2011 p o s t -p r i n t v e r s i o n M a r c o M a s o n interviews) was subject to approval by a committee 4 on the use of humans as experimental subjects. To obtain informed consent from interviewees (appendix C), I provided the participants with a detailed explanation of the research, its purposes and procedures, as well as the participant's rights regarding anonymity, confidentiality, and withdrawal from the study.…”
Section: The Research Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual team members can spread both positive and negative emotions throughout the entire team (Kelly & Barsade, 2001) and their belief structures play a role in the development of shared cognition (Klimoski & Mohammed, 1994). Additionally, nonverbal communication has been shown to have an impact in design team interactions (Le Dantec & Do, 2009). Such aspects have become even more important with the spread and effectiveness of cross-functional teams (Parker, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%