The measurement and prevention of erosion and abrasion

Azzopardi, Andrew; Bartlett, David; Watson, Tim; Sherriff, Martyn

doi:10.1016/s0300-5712(01)00031-8

Cited by 79 publications

(94 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…1,2 Dentine adhesive resins are known to infiltrate the top 1 -10 µm of conditioned dentine, leaving a matrix composed of adhesive, collagen, and dentine that has the potential to bond to a composite resin. 3 This complex, called the resin reinforced hybrid zone, may have the potential to protect dentine against acids for patients with erosion.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The surface effects of erosion and abrasion on dentine with and without a protective layer

et al. 2004

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The aim of this in situ study was to investigate with four imaging modalities whether covering dentine with adhesive resins could protect against erosion from acids. The objectives were to observe and quantify the effects of acids and the soft tissues, especially the tongue, on dentine and the bonding agents using four assessment techniques: qualitative assessment with SEM, surface roughness and thickness of resin with the TSM and volume loss with the laser profilometer. Design An in situ investigation using extracted dentine sections embedded in splints held on the palate of 10 volunteers. The dentine sections were protected by two resins and subjected to a tooth wear regime. Results Both Seal and Protect and Opitbond Solo protected the tooth surfaces from a tooth wear regime. There were no statistical differences between the control surfaces and those protected with dentine bonding agents for resin thickness, roughness and profilometry. The appearance of the slabs under both confocal and SEM showed that the material remained in place despite a vigorous wear regime and therefore protected the tooth surface. Conclusions For patients with uncontrolled erosion or tooth wear, applying a dentine bonding agent to exposed dentine is a practical option to prevent further damage.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The surface effects of erosion and abrasion on dentine with and without a protective layer

et al. 2004

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In contrast, the first in-vitro study [17] evaluating the possible protective effects of Seal&Protect against erosive/abrasive tooth wear found a mean wear of Seal&Protect of 2.79 ± 21.51 µm after 3000 cycles in a reciprocating (= 6000 brushing strokes) wear machine when samples were brushed with water. When samples were brushed while immersed in hydrochloric acid, a ten-fold higher wear was recorded (24.8 ± 57.4 µm).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

“…When samples were brushed while immersed in hydrochloric acid, a ten-fold higher wear was recorded (24.8 ± 57.4 µm). Considering the remaining thicknesses of the sealants in the present study (around 20 µm after 12000 brushing strokes) and the wear of the sealants by the 12000 brushing strokes (around 2 µm) one might assume that the used sealants of the present study will only be removed when conditions used by Azzopardi et al (2001) [17] are applied.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This method of quantification has been applied for these purposes in different other studies [17,29,30]. For the here used profilometer, a lower limit of measurements of 0.105 µm has been determined, allowing an exact quantification of even the lowest wear (0.82 µm) found in this study.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As well as dentine, the coating can be abraded by toothbrushing or during mastication [17]. The stability of such a resin-based coating differs between different coating systems [17].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Influence of prophylaxis paste treatment on the abrasive wear of surface sealants

Wegehaupt

Tauböck

Attin

2012

Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the abrasive wear of surface sealants (SealProtect and K-0184 (experimental sealant)) and the influence of pre-treatment with mineral deposit forming prophylaxis pastes (NUPRO Sensodyne and NUPRO) on this wear. METHODS: One hundred and eight bovine dentine samples were randomly allocated to nine groups (1-9). Pre-treatment (10 s): groups 1-3: untreated, groups 4-6: NUPRO, groups 7-9: NUPRO Sensodyne. Sealing: groups 1, 4 and 7: unsealed, groups 2, 5 and 8: SealProtect, groups 3, 6 and 9: K-0184 (experimental sealer). Samples were then brushed with 12 000 brushing strokes (BS) with toothpaste slurry in an automatic brushing machine (120 BS/min; F = 2.5 N). Surface profiles were recorded at baseline, after pre-treatment and sealing and after each 2000 BS. RESULTS: Total profile change (wear or gain due to pre-treatment, treatment and 12 000 BS): groups 1, 4 and 7 (no surface sealant) showed a not significantly different wear of 18.48 ± 2.63 µm, 24.98 ± 3.02 µm and 21.50 ± 5.47 µm, respectively. Remaining groups (sealed) showed a gain in height with no significant difference among each other. Wear in sealed groups (2, 3, 5, 6, 8 and 9) were not significantly different at all numbers of brushing strokes. Starting with 4000 BS, the wear in unsealed groups (1, 4 and 7) was statistically significantly higher compared to all other groups. CONCLUSION: Stability and wear resistance of surface sealants are not affected by pre-treatment of dentine with NUPRO Sensodyne. The surface sealants tested provide a stable protective surface layer on dentine, which lasts for at least 12 000 brushing strokes. Abstract:Objective: To investigate the abrasive wear of surface sealants (Seal&Protect and K-0184 (experimental sealant)) and the influence of pre-treatment with mineral deposit forming prophylaxis pastes (NUPRO Sensodyne and NUPRO) on this wear.Methods: 108 bovine dentine samples were randomly allocated to nine groups (1-9). Pretreatment (10 s): groups 1-3: untreated, groups 4-6: NUPRO, groups 7-9: NUPRO Sensodyne.Sealing: groups 1, 4 and 7: unsealed, groups 2, 5 and 8: Seal&Protect, groups 3, 6 and 9: K-0184 (experimental sealer). Samples were then brushed with 12000 brushing strokes (BS) with toothpaste slurry in an automatic brushing machine (120 BS/min; F = 2.5 N). Surface profiles were recorded at baseline, after pre-treatment and sealing, and after each 2000 BS.Results: Total profile change (wear or gain due to pre-treatment, treatment and 12000 BS): groups 1, 4 and 7 (no surface sealant) showed a not significantly different wear of 18.48±2.63 µm, 24.98±3.02 µm and 21.50±5.47 µm, respectively. Remaining groups (sealed) showed a gain in height with no significant difference among each other.Wear in sealed groups (2, 3, 5, 6, 8 and 9) were not significantly different at all numbers of brushing strokes. Starting with 4000 BS, the wear in unsealed groups (1, 4 and 7) was statistically significantly higher compared to all other groups.Conclusion: Stability and wear resistance of surface sea...

show abstract

Penetration of resin‐based materials into initial erosion lesion: A confocal microscopic study

Ionta

Boteon

Moretto³

et al. 2015

Microscopy Res & Technique

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The application of resin-based materials is an alternative of treatment for eroded lesions. Nevertheless, there are no studies about the penetration of these materials into eroded lesion, which might affect its adhesion. Therefore, this study evaluated the penetration of four resin-based materials, with and without enamel etching. By using an in vitro protocol, types of treatment were studied at five levels (AdheSE(®) , Tetric N-Bond(®) , Single Bond 2(®) , Helioseal Clear(®) , Icon(®) ) and types of enamel etching in two levels (with and without). Materials were stained with 0.02 mg/mL ethanolic solution of tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate. Bovine enamel samples (4 × 4 mm) were immersed in 0.01 M HCl, pH 2.3, for 30 seconds to produce initial eroded lesions. Afterward, the materials were applied on half of sample enamel surface following the manufacturer's instructions. On the other half of sample, the materials were applied without etching the enamel. Materials penetration into the enamel was assessed by Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy on reflection and fluorescence modes. The penetration depth (PD) was measured using ImageJ software. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (P < 0.05). Regardless of the material, etched enamel resulted in higher PD than non-etched (P < 0.05). Icon(®) showed the highest PD in enamel followed by Helioseal Clear(®) (P < 0.05), with significant difference between them (P < 0.05) and no difference was found among AdheSE(®) , Tetric N-Bond(®) , and Single Bond 2(®) (P > 0.05). It can be concluded that prior enamel etching increased the materials penetration into eroded enamel and the Icon(®) -infiltrant presented highest penetration.

show abstract

The measurement and prevention of erosion and abrasion

Cited by 79 publications

References 12 publications

The surface effects of erosion and abrasion on dentine with and without a protective layer

The surface effects of erosion and abrasion on dentine with and without a protective layer

Influence of prophylaxis paste treatment on the abrasive wear of surface sealants

Penetration of resin‐based materials into initial erosion lesion: A confocal microscopic study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About