2000
DOI: 10.1006/jevp.1999.0174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Meaning and Efficacy of Social Withdrawal as a Strategy for Coping With Chronic Residential Crowding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In all cases, cultural differences in customer's response to spatial distancing were found to influence the use of space and the socialinteraction style (Hall, 1966;Heimstra & McFarling, 1978). The North American culture is often depicted as the archetypal individualistic and low-contact culture (Altman, 1975;Evans et al, 2000;Markus & Kitamaya, 1991;Park, 1998), whereas the East Asian culture (i.e., China, Japan, and Korea), is generally described as a high-contact culture that promotes collectivistic strivings (Hall, 1966;Hofstede, 1980).…”
Section: Cultural Difference As An Influential Factor On Service Envimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all cases, cultural differences in customer's response to spatial distancing were found to influence the use of space and the socialinteraction style (Hall, 1966;Heimstra & McFarling, 1978). The North American culture is often depicted as the archetypal individualistic and low-contact culture (Altman, 1975;Evans et al, 2000;Markus & Kitamaya, 1991;Park, 1998), whereas the East Asian culture (i.e., China, Japan, and Korea), is generally described as a high-contact culture that promotes collectivistic strivings (Hall, 1966;Hofstede, 1980).…”
Section: Cultural Difference As An Influential Factor On Service Envimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the need for a better social and psychological understanding of crowding issues is reinforced by the daily challenges of urban and crowded lives (Sinha & Nayyar, 2000). Finally, although research on crowding has, in recent years, benefited from important developments in sociology and psychology (Brierley & Newell, 1998;Evans, Rhee, Forbes, Allen, & Lepore, 2000;Felmlee & Sprecher, 2000;Stott & Drury, 2000), the marketing field has yet to integrate most of these findings in a commercial setting. Indeed, several gaps in the business literature call for a deeper analysis of crowd-related issues.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For the older group, privacy was not mentioned very frequently, and it was associated only with their real personalspace, the bedroom. The desired level of interactions was not the same forboth groups, and we know that well-being is associated with a balancebetween desired and achieved levels of social interaction (Evans, Rhee,Forbes, Mata-Allen, &Lepore, 2000). Thus, results from other research sharingthe social categorization in ICEs (Weiss & Gaud, 2004) could be to a certainextent explained by these different needs in terms of privacy and socialcontacts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%