This study aims to examine the relationship between the STEM education approach and the 2018 Science Curriculum in the context of STEM education's applicability at the classroom level. This study is a document analysis, and within this scope, the current science curriculum was examined in five different dimensions. Objectives and sentences in the current science curriculum were used as the unit of analysis. The program's aims, the teaching approach, the objectives, the teacher's roles, and the student were evaluated in terms of the STEM education approach's applicability. The program structure published in 2017 was evaluated within this scope compared to the update made in 2018. As a result of the document analysis, the STEM education approach was found to be convenient considering the program's purposes, the teaching approaches it supports, and the roles of the teacher and the student. Considering the objectives dimension, it has been found that the science curriculum tries to present the engineering design process through particular objectives and especially by using the act of "designing". In the 2017 curriculum, although there is a set of objectives that include all engineering design process steps in this context, the curriculum's objectives updated in 2018 focus mostly on "design", which is only one dimension of the engineering design process. In terms of the STEM education approach, it has been determined as a deficiency that the current program does not include all the objectives covering engineering design, at least in the appropriate order and complete.