2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-8141(99)00182-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Maxwell stability criterion in pseudo-energy models of kink banding

Abstract: Kink banding, common to many structures in nature and engineering, has several distinctive features-notably highly nonlinear snap-back instability leading to localization and sequential lock-up. The proposed friction model, although simplified, introduces these defining characteristics without obscuring them by including other effects of lesser immediate significance. In the absence of small imperfections or disturbances, linearized theory suggests that in its pre-kinked configuration the system never goes uns… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
66
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been found to be prevalent in systems where there is progressive destabilization and subsequent restabilization (Wadee & Bassom 2000;Peletier 2001), such as in cylindrical shell buckling (Hunt et al 1999(Hunt et al , 2003 and kink banding in confined layers (Hunt et al 2000b;Wadee & Edmunds 2005). In the fundamental studies concerning the model strut on a nonlinear foundation, the load oscillates about the Maxwell load, where the buckling modes progressively transform from localized (homoclinic) profiles to a periodic mode in a heteroclinic connection (Budd et al 2001;Wadee et al 2002;Chapman & Kozyreff 2009).…”
Section: Numerical Results and Validation (A) Cellular Bucklingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been found to be prevalent in systems where there is progressive destabilization and subsequent restabilization (Wadee & Bassom 2000;Peletier 2001), such as in cylindrical shell buckling (Hunt et al 1999(Hunt et al , 2003 and kink banding in confined layers (Hunt et al 2000b;Wadee & Edmunds 2005). In the fundamental studies concerning the model strut on a nonlinear foundation, the load oscillates about the Maxwell load, where the buckling modes progressively transform from localized (homoclinic) profiles to a periodic mode in a heteroclinic connection (Budd et al 2001;Wadee et al 2002;Chapman & Kozyreff 2009).…”
Section: Numerical Results and Validation (A) Cellular Bucklingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a given time the resulting profile shows a periodic section flanked by decaying tails; as the shortening increases the periodic section widens. Similar examples of localization followed by spreading are found in axially loaded cylinders [14,8], in sandwich structures [9], and in kink banding in layered materials [10]. The survey paper [9] discusses these examples from a common perspective.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Chaudhuri & Kim [36] for a detailed discussion), for a very thick elastic (very) long cylindrical shell (R i /h = 3), and sufficiently higher average fibre misalignment (φ/γ f = 1.5). Maxwell's construction has also been employed by Hunt & Lucena Neto [59], Budiansky et al [60], Hunt et al [61] and Wadee & Edmunds [62] for similar purposes.…”
Section: (B) Effect Of Average (Uniformly Distributed) Fibre Misalignmentioning
confidence: 99%