The MathServe System for Semantic Web Reasoning Services

Zimmer, Jürgen; Autexier, Serge

doi:10.1007/11814771_12

Cited by 10 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The idea of separate reasoning tools communicating to enhance a proof development environment is also being pursued in the Evidential Tool Bus [16] and the MathServe System [17]. This idea is a natural extension of the integration of automatic tools with interactive theorem provers.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Standalone Tactics Using OpenTheory

Kumar

Hurd

2012

Interactive Theorem Proving

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Proof tools in interactive theorem provers are usually developed within and tied to a specific system, which leads to a duplication of effort to make the functionality available in different systems. Many verification projects would benefit from access to proof tools developed in other systems. Using OpenTheory as a language for communicating between systems, we show how to turn a proof tool implemented for one system into a standalone tactic available to many systems via the internet. This enables, for example, LCF-style proof reconstruction efforts to be shared by users of different interactive theorem provers and removes the need for each user to install the external tool being integrated.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Standalone Tactics Using OpenTheory

Kumar

Hurd

2012

Interactive Theorem Proving

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…OMDoc elaborates the semantical content of documents, which goes beyond the scope of PG Kit. Other systems such as MONET [14], the MathBroker [18] and MathServe [27] have an architecture similar to ours, but integrate fully automated provers (Otter, Spass etc.) wrapped up as web services, with a broker orchestrating proofs between different provers with little user interaction during the actual proof.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Framework for Interactive Proof

Aspinall

Lüth²,

Winterstein

Towards Mechanized Mathematical Assistants

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. This paper introduces Proof General Kit, a framework for software components tailored to interactive proof development. The goal of the framework is to enable flexible environments for managing formal proofs across their life-cycle: creation, maintenance and exploitation. The framework connects together different kinds of component, exchanging messages using a common communication infrastructure and protocol called PGIP. The main channel connects provers to displays. Provers are the back-end interactive proof engines and displays are components for interacting with the user, allowing browsing or editing of proofs. At the core of the framework is a broker middleware component which manages proof-in-progress and mediates between components.

show abstract

“…FOL/TPTP is untyped first-order logic with equality, 6 underlying the interchange language TPTP [36], see http://www.tptp.org. HETS offers several automated theorem proving (ATP) systems for TPTP, namely SPASS [37], Vampire [33], Eprover [35], Darwin [2], E-KRHyper [32], and Math-Serve Broker (which chooses an appropriate ATP upon a classification of the FOL problem) [38].…”

Section: Logics Supported By Hetsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Proof Support for Common Logic

Mossakowski¹,

Codescu²,

Kutz³

et al.

EPiC Series in Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We present the theoretical background for an extension of the Heterogeneous Tool Set Hets that enables proof support for Common Logic. This is achieved via logic translations that relate Common Logic and some of its sublogics to already supported logics and automated theorem proving systems. We thus provide the first theorem proving support for Common Logic covering the full language, including the possibility of verifying meta-theoretical relationships between Common Logic theories.

show abstract

The MathServe System for Semantic Web Reasoning Services

Cited by 10 publications

References 4 publications

Standalone Tactics Using OpenTheory

Standalone Tactics Using OpenTheory

A Framework for Interactive Proof

Proof Support for Common Logic

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About