2006
DOI: 10.1007/bf03217427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mathematical tale of two teachers: A longitudinal study relating mathematics instructional practices to level of intellectual development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, structural knowledge, reflecting relationships between concepts and topics is a higher order learning outcome resonant with notions of relational understanding as described by Skemp (1976). Finally, the characteristics of this factor reflect well current perspectives on reform mathematics teaching, whereby learners actively construct rather than passively receive knowledge (Cady et al 2007;Peterson et al 1989) and, "through interaction, are able to challenge one another's constructions in ways that facilitate the construction of increasingly shared and powerful knowledge" (Beswick 2005, p. 43) in classrooms that emphasise the making of mathematical connections (Cady et al 2007;Peterson et al 1989;Spillane and Zeuli 1999). In sum, we construe this factor as a relational participation.…”
Section: Interpreting the Factorssupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, structural knowledge, reflecting relationships between concepts and topics is a higher order learning outcome resonant with notions of relational understanding as described by Skemp (1976). Finally, the characteristics of this factor reflect well current perspectives on reform mathematics teaching, whereby learners actively construct rather than passively receive knowledge (Cady et al 2007;Peterson et al 1989) and, "through interaction, are able to challenge one another's constructions in ways that facilitate the construction of increasingly shared and powerful knowledge" (Beswick 2005, p. 43) in classrooms that emphasise the making of mathematical connections (Cady et al 2007;Peterson et al 1989;Spillane and Zeuli 1999). In sum, we construe this factor as a relational participation.…”
Section: Interpreting the Factorssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…On the one hand, the activation of prior knowledge, matches reform expectations that teachers take account of learners' prior knowledge when making decisions about lesson progression (Beswick 2005;Cady et al 2007;Peterson et al 1989). On the other hand, reform classrooms are also characterised by an emphasis on problem solving (Cady et al 2007;Peterson et al 1989;Spillane and Zeuli 1999). Such findings highlight the fact that effective mathematics teaching is a complex interaction of many factors and that these may not, depending on circumstances, be complementary.…”
Section: Interpreting the Factorsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…There are many other factors that influence teacher development. For example, an individual's level of intellectual development and locus of authority is related to his/her development as a teacher, as is the individual's beliefs about mathematics and the learning of mathematics (Cady, Meier, & Lubinski, 2006). The interaction of these and many other factors that influence the teaching and learning of mathematics can and should be studied in relation to an individual's development of SKT.…”
Section: Conclusion Implications and Recommendations For Further Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown links between teacher development programmes and the changing of teacher beliefs and practices (Hofer & Pintrich, 1997). As teachers become more competent in dealing with the demands of teaching, they attempt more ambitious forms of teaching; this is especially the case when constructivist ideas are introduced during teacher development programmes (Cady, Meier, & Lubinski, 2006).…”
Section: Teacher Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%