1970
DOI: 10.2307/1913013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mathematical Relation Between the Income Density Function and the Measurement of Income Inequality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

1974
1974
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Remember (8). It follows that, for values of low enough, the second term in (23) is close enough to zero, the signal of…”
Section: Propositionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remember (8). It follows that, for values of low enough, the second term in (23) is close enough to zero, the signal of…”
Section: Propositionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The following lines pursue a general expression for the Lorenz curve and for the Gini coe¢ cient as a function of any arbitrary distribution of wage o¤ers F w (:): First, in Proposition 1, we use a general procedure detailed by Levine and Singer (1970) to show that the area under the Lorenz Curve can be directly expressed in terms of f p (s) only. Proposition 2 then uses the result of Proposition 1 and the expression of f p (s) given by (4) to determine the area under the Lorenz curve and, by (15), the Gini coe¢ cient of wage distribution as well.…”
Section: The Gini Coe¢ Cientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next lines pursue an expression for the Lorenz curve as a function of f p ; which is known. This will allow us to characterize what happens with the Gini coe¢ cient of income inequality when the parameters and change, given the measure m w :The procedure detailed by Levine and Singer (1970) can be useful here.…”
Section: A General Expression For the Gini Coe¢cientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La literatura (Latham, 1988;Levine-Singer, 1970) muestra que la aplicación de un impuesto proporcional mantiene la desigualdad inalterada; qué significa esto, si el gobierno quiere cambiar la estructura impositiva con algún objetivo: una mejor distribución o un mayor crecimiento (Alesina-Rodrik, 1994), habría que considerar no afectar a la totalidad y mostrar al menos que se sigue perteneciendo a cierto sector de la población. Pero aún más grave, habría que tener cuidado a la hora de la aplicación de esta política de impuestos, es decir, evitar un posible conflicto por el hecho de que la sociedad pague tal impuesto.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified