2007
DOI: 10.1007/s12124-007-9037-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Materiality of the Abstraction Voice

Abstract: The comment on Bertau's paper underlines the importance of the internally social character of the dialogical self, which is not trivial and can not be taken for granted. A consistent theory of this internal character demands specific theoretical means native to a tradition of Leibniz' philosophy. In consequence the concept of dialogical self is presented as a non-empirical one based in an ethos. We, and not nature, are responsible for the modes of conceptualising.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Bertau ; Bertau, Gonçalves, and Raggatt ) and neuroscience (see Lewis and Todd ). Voice, the key Bakhtinian concept, has received special attention in the discussion (e.g., Bertau , ; Linell, Beatrice, and César ; Schürmann ). Upon constructing a voice called “The Hopi in me,” Ingrid Josephs () further introduced the theoretical conceptions of George Simmel ( [1911], ) and Ernest Boesch () to illuminate the formation of the dialogical self.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Bertau ; Bertau, Gonçalves, and Raggatt ) and neuroscience (see Lewis and Todd ). Voice, the key Bakhtinian concept, has received special attention in the discussion (e.g., Bertau , ; Linell, Beatrice, and César ; Schürmann ). Upon constructing a voice called “The Hopi in me,” Ingrid Josephs () further introduced the theoretical conceptions of George Simmel ( [1911], ) and Ernest Boesch () to illuminate the formation of the dialogical self.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%