Voice as Materialistic Principle

Abstract

In this reply, three core notions from Schürmann's comment The materiality of the abstraction "voice" are picked out and discussed: the ethos, the so called trialogical self and vocality as principle. The notion of ethos is explored through the word's history, coming to say that ethos develops in relation to a certain geographical place and is determined by the social practices of a historically situated community. Thus, the concept allows to see how current scientific activities are rooted in reality, taken in the socio-cultural sense. The "trialogical self" is discussed in its implications, leading to firmly retain "dialogical self" as sign of a movement leading through the other to self. Schürmann's distinction of voice as phenomenon and vocality as principle is seen as fruitful supplement to own ideas, especially as it highlights the fact that it is the act of uttering in different modes which matters for a language notion based in addressivity.

The Role of Cultural Sign in Cultivating the Dialogical Self: The Case ofThe Ox-Herding Pictures

“…; Bertau ; Bertau, Gonçalves, and Raggatt ) and neuroscience (see Lewis and Todd ). Voice, the key Bakhtinian concept, has received special attention in the discussion (e.g., Bertau , ; Linell, Beatrice, and César ; Schürmann ). Upon constructing a voice called “The Hopi in me,” Ingrid Josephs () further introduced the theoretical conceptions of George Simmel ( [1911], ) and Ernest Boesch () to illuminate the formation of the dialogical self.…”