2007
DOI: 10.1080/03085140701428332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The material production of virtuality: innovation, cultural geography and facticity in derivatives markets

Abstract: Abstract:In the existing literature, the 'virtual' nature of financial derivatives is often commented upon, but how these products are brought into being has seldom been examined in any depth. This article analyzes the development since 1970 of organized financial-derivatives trading in the U.S. and U.K. (in particular, of derivatives exchanges and of the British financial spread-betting industry), with the goal of examining the 'material production of virtuality'. The article explores the similarities and dif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The emergence of new actors and changes in investors' strategies and the use of new financial instruments raises fundamental questions regarding the potential non-unanimity of shareholders interests, the related notion of "shareholder value," and the agency relationships (Bradley, Schipani, Sundaram, & Walsh, 1999). Many of these phenomena are most actively being discussed within the literature on new "social studies in finance" (Beunza, Hardie, & MacKenzie, 2006;MacKenzie, 2007) and the economic sociology of markets (Beckert, 2003;Fligstein & Dauter, 2007), but remain sadly divorced from debates over corporate governance. Here, we note that firms are increasingly being populated by two new types of owners: foreign institutional investors and SWFs, each with their particular sets of interests on the firm, as well as strategic modes for participating in the firm.…”
Section: Institutional Change New Actors and The Dynamics Of Ownersmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The emergence of new actors and changes in investors' strategies and the use of new financial instruments raises fundamental questions regarding the potential non-unanimity of shareholders interests, the related notion of "shareholder value," and the agency relationships (Bradley, Schipani, Sundaram, & Walsh, 1999). Many of these phenomena are most actively being discussed within the literature on new "social studies in finance" (Beunza, Hardie, & MacKenzie, 2006;MacKenzie, 2007) and the economic sociology of markets (Beckert, 2003;Fligstein & Dauter, 2007), but remain sadly divorced from debates over corporate governance. Here, we note that firms are increasingly being populated by two new types of owners: foreign institutional investors and SWFs, each with their particular sets of interests on the firm, as well as strategic modes for participating in the firm.…”
Section: Institutional Change New Actors and The Dynamics Of Ownersmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…But at the global level, institutional investors enjoy a competitive advantage in accumulating infor mation about market movements because the size and scope of their positions gives them this edge. As well, coordination and networking between specific sectors of instituional investors remains common (Abolafia, 1996;MacKenzie, 2007MacKenzie, , 2008. New innovations by fund managers, such as leveraged buyouts, are quickly copied and cycles of opportunism are created that consolidate and reproduce the overall stratification of investors-as, for example, Malaysia's nationalisation, privatisation, re-nationalisation cycle in the case of Malaysian Airlines.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For a firm to measure and report its profits, for example, each transaction or economic item must be classified according to local and global rules and conventions (MacKenzie, 2007;Hatherly et al, 2008). Carbon accounting also requires work to classify what counts as a 'human activity' and, hence, what economic policies will be necessary for a party to meet its target.…”
Section: Defining and Classifying Carbon Sinks: Measurement Reportinmentioning
confidence: 99%