2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2006.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The material mapping strategy influences the accuracy of CT-based finite element models of bones: An evaluation against experimental measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
152
0
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
152
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Each axial slice was filtered using a mean filter of 4x4 pixel size to compensate for the HU overestimation due to this kernel. Bonemat_V3 (Taddei et al, 2007) assigned inhomogeneous isotropic material properties to the elements, based on the HU values of the volume enclosed by each element. HU values were converted to equivalent radiological density (Model 3CT, Mindways Inc.), and the Young's modulus was derived using the relationships proposed by (Schileo et al, 2008).…”
Section: Finite Element Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each axial slice was filtered using a mean filter of 4x4 pixel size to compensate for the HU overestimation due to this kernel. Bonemat_V3 (Taddei et al, 2007) assigned inhomogeneous isotropic material properties to the elements, based on the HU values of the volume enclosed by each element. HU values were converted to equivalent radiological density (Model 3CT, Mindways Inc.), and the Young's modulus was derived using the relationships proposed by (Schileo et al, 2008).…”
Section: Finite Element Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[40][41][42][43][44][45][46] In this case, the 3D FE models are generated from the set of slices driven by CT. Generally, the real microarchitecture of the trabecular bone is not considered and the obtained model models are partitioned into trabecular bone and cortical bone continuum regions with the Hounsfield (HU) scale: HU4600 are taken as the cortical region. 47 For simplicity and due to the limited knowledge of the anisotropic behavior of bone, most FE models for bone organs fracture simulation (femur and vertebra mainly) considered the bone tissue as continuum inhomogeneous and isotropic material with empirical assigned material properties based on empirical density-elasticity relationships to every FE of the mesh driven by CT scans.…”
Section: Fea Of Bone Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17][18] As we already mentioned above, an accurate density-elasticity correlation concerning the pelvic bone is not known yet, it has only been determined with indirect methods. [10,15] Nevertheless, our mean elastic modulus values (sacrum 3710 MPa, pelvic bone 4900 MPa) calculated from the cortical-cancellous bone ratio nears those, that can be found in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used method is determination of the elasticity from the density, [10,[15][16][17][18] although such a value explicitly for the pelvis bone has not been determined to date. Recommendations for the most feasible density-elasticity relationship are already available.…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%