2015
DOI: 10.1214/ecp.v20-3449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The martingale property in the context of stochastic differential equations

Abstract: This note studies the martingale property of a nonnegative, continuous local martingale Z, given as a nonanticipative functional of a solution to a stochastic differential equation. The condition states that Z is a (uniformly integrable) martingale if and only if an integral test of a related functional holds.also has a weak solution Y , at least up to the first time that the process K := · 0 µ(s,

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar result for the general setting of multidimensional diffusions appears in theorem 1 ofRuf (2013a).…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…A similar result for the general setting of multidimensional diffusions appears in theorem 1 ofRuf (2013a).…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…The remainder of this note is devoted to the proofs of Theorems 1 and 2, which we now outline. The proof of Theorem 1 follows the classical argument (found already in the aforementioned [19,15,16], see also [3,18] for additional references) relating the martingale property of stochastic exponentials with explosions of a SDE (in our case, this will be a Volterra SDE). The martingale property (1) is then essentially immediate, while the proof of (2) follows from the fact that the Volterra SDE may blow up in arbitrarily short time with positive probability.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In each of these four cases, the local martingale M(·) is a true martingale with expectation equal to M(0) = 1 . This is obvious in the first three cases, and follows from the considerations of [41] or of [50] in the last case. Thus, we may define a probability measure Q (T ) on F(T ) via the recipe dQ (T ) /dP o ξ = M(T ).…”
Section: Proposition 44 (The Explosion Time Distribution Is Not Suppmentioning
confidence: 70%