2019
DOI: 10.1214/19-ecp239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the martingale property in the rough Bergomi model

Abstract: We consider a class of fractional stochastic volatility models (including the so-called rough Bergomi model), where the volatility is a superlinear function of a fractional Gaussian process. We show that the stock price is a true martingale if and only if the correlation ρ between the driving Brownian motions of the stock and the volatility is nonpositive. We also show that for each ρ < 0 and m > 1 1−ρ 2 , the m-th moment of the stock price is infinite at each positive time.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to be able to use the system (1) for pricing purposes, we need to show how to complete the market, and to check for the existence of some probability measure under which the stock price is a true martingale. The latter issue was solved for the rough Heston model by El Euch and Rosenbaum [25], while the rough Bergomi case with non-positive correlation was recently proved by Gassiat [31]. We show that this still holds in our framework.…”
Section: 2supporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to be able to use the system (1) for pricing purposes, we need to show how to complete the market, and to check for the existence of some probability measure under which the stock price is a true martingale. The latter issue was solved for the rough Heston model by El Euch and Rosenbaum [25], while the rough Bergomi case with non-positive correlation was recently proved by Gassiat [31]. We show that this still holds in our framework.…”
Section: 2supporting
confidence: 56%
“…Remark 2.5. Following [31], we could in fact partially relax the assumption on the function l(·). Assume for example that l(t, S, v) = L(t, S)ς(v), but with Assumption 2.1 replaced by ς(v) = exp(ηv), for some η > 0.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Scott model, the volatility process is the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, while the volatility function is σ(x) = e x . Gassiat obtained a similar result for a model with ρ < 0, the volatility function satisfying condition (G), and the Riemann-Liouville fractional Brownian motion with H > 1 2 as the volatility process (see Theorem 2 in [24]). We do not assume in part (ii) of Theorem 6.11 that the model is negatively correlated and the volatility function satisfies condition (G).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The previous assertion was first included in the arXiv:1808.00421v4 (September 22, 2018) version of the present paper. The same result in a special case, where the volatility process is the Riemann-Liouville fractional Brownian motion with the Hurst index H > 1 2 , while the volatility function satisfies an additional condition (condition (G) formulated before Theorem 6.11), was obtained independently, but a little later, by Gassiat (see Theorem 2 in the arXiv:1811.10935v1 (November 27, 2018) version of [24]). We also show that in a correlated Volterra type Gaussian model (ρ = 0), all the moments of the order γ > 1 1−ρ 2 7…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The most basic form of (lognormal) rough volatility model is the so-called rough Bergomi model introduced in [BFG16]. Gassiat [Gas18] recently proved that such a model (under certain correlation regimes) generates true martingales for the spot process. The lack of Markovianity imposes numerous fundamental theoretical questions and practical challenges in order to make rough volatility usable in an industrial environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%