1982
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(82)90311-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The MARS appliance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The changes that the TFBC promoted in maxillary and mandibular components improved significantly the maxillomandibular relationship (Table 3), in accordance with the findings of other studies. 3,19,20 At T2 (Table 4), these significant differences in maxillomandibular relationship were not present, since the maxillomandibular relationship was more accentuated in the experimental group (Table 2) in T1. This likely occurred because the experimental group presented more accentuated Class II characteristics at T1 and presented more Class II correction with treatment, resulting in non-statistically significant differences between groups at T2.…”
Section: -13mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The changes that the TFBC promoted in maxillary and mandibular components improved significantly the maxillomandibular relationship (Table 3), in accordance with the findings of other studies. 3,19,20 At T2 (Table 4), these significant differences in maxillomandibular relationship were not present, since the maxillomandibular relationship was more accentuated in the experimental group (Table 2) in T1. This likely occurred because the experimental group presented more accentuated Class II characteristics at T1 and presented more Class II correction with treatment, resulting in non-statistically significant differences between groups at T2.…”
Section: -13mentioning
confidence: 94%