2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2010.02220.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Market Impact of Relative Agency Activity in the Sovereign Ratings Market

Abstract: credit rating , rating change , credit watch , information , sovereign ,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
51
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
4
51
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[34] discuss that the most of the incremental information value is transmitted through negative credit warnings (i.e., "outlooks," "reviews," and "watches,"), rather than actual rating 455 changes. The same conclusion is also reported in [35], [36] and [12]. Our analysis confirms instead a reputation issue attached to rating agencies: market participants do not rely on rating agencies assessment in default risks in government bonds.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…[34] discuss that the most of the incremental information value is transmitted through negative credit warnings (i.e., "outlooks," "reviews," and "watches,"), rather than actual rating 455 changes. The same conclusion is also reported in [35], [36] and [12]. Our analysis confirms instead a reputation issue attached to rating agencies: market participants do not rely on rating agencies assessment in default risks in government bonds.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Brooks, Faff, Hillier, and Hillier (2004) also find a negative effect of rating downgrades on stock returns, but we differ by providing evidence of information leakage before the official announcement, especially in countries with lower institutional quality. Martell (2005) and Hill and Faff (2010) further find evidence of movements in stock returns before rating announcements, but we differ from these papers by showing a causal link between sovereign institutional quality and stock market reactions prior to downgrades and by conducting an extensive analysis of preannouncement news to show that our results are driven not by concurrent news unrelated to the downgrade, but rather by the leakage of information. Afonso, Furceri and Gomes (2012) focus on sovereign bond yield responses to rating changes in EU countries and find evidence of bi-directional causality between yields and rating changes, consistent with event anticipation.…”
contrasting
confidence: 78%
“…We model the realized moments of asset returns as endogenous variables in the system and we take the view that the sovereign ratings drift is not necessarily explained by the system of those realized moments. This assumption is supported by the myriad of prior studies showing the significant market impact of sovereign credit ratings information (see inter alia, Alsakka and ap Gwilym, 2012a, Brooks et al, 2004, and Hill and Faff, 2010a. The sovereign ratings drift is rather determined by public information as well as the private information owned and subjectively assessed by the CRAs.…”
Section: Econometric Modellingsupporting
confidence: 57%