The Many Returns of Philology: A State of the Field Report

Hui, Andrew

doi:10.1353/jhi.2017.0006

Cited by 35 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Philologist scrutinizes changes in words' meaning and forms with the help of archetypal texts whenever available. Hui (2017) has stated that philology has the power to unlock the dynamic of textual scholarship and analysis and push the many returns of experts to study language text analysis. Although to some experts like Pollock (2016), philology is something like a soft yet respectable science in the harsh futuristic world or a small item to start the big possibility (Manni, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Acehnese Loanwords and Contact with Other World's Languages

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The research aimed to uncover some Acehnese loanwords’ etymological and historical roots, which may help unravel the relationships between the world’s languages. The method applied in the research was the word-etymology model or lexical etymology to trace the word’s origins in historical linguistics. In addition, the systematic comparison with other related languages and semantic change typology were also exercised for the purpose of analysis. The data consisted of some selected Acehnese loanwords from the phone interviews with the participants selected purposively in different districts in Aceh. The findings reveal that the Acehnese language is etymologically categorized as part of the Austronesian language (Chamic and Malay), Arabic Afro-Asiatic language, Sanskrit (Bengali, Urdu, Gujarat), English, and Indo-European. The research attests that Acehnese loanwords may also be influenced by cross-language loanwords and borrowings simultaneously, such as Arabic from the Afro-Asiatic language family, Dutch or German, and English from the Indo-European language.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Acehnese Loanwords and Contact with Other World's Languages

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…npr. Altschul, 2010 Bajohr i dr, 2014;Bal, 1987;Beganović, 2016;Biti, 2014;Brebanović, 2021;Culler, 1990; Daston i Most, 2015;de Man, 1986;Eisner, 2011;Ferguson, 2013;Glavaš, 2015;Gumbrecht, 2003;Gurd, 2010;Harpham, 2009;Holquist, 1999Holquist, , 2000Holquist, , 2002 Holquist, i 2011Hui, 2017;Jacob, 1999;Johnson, 1990;Lönnroth, 2017;McGann, 2013;Messling, 2012;Momma, 2012;Nichols, 1990;Pollock, 2009; Pollock i dr, 2015;Said, 2004;Turner, 2014;Vadde, 2012;Warren, 2003 Warren, i 2010Watkins, 1990; 5 Od Nietzscheovih bilježaka o odnosu onodobne filologije, filozofije i obrazovanja(1973)(1974) 11875) preko "zlatnog doba filologije"(Holquist, 1999, 77) i djelovanja, između ostalih, L. Spitzera, E.R. Curtiusa, E. Auerbacha, W. Benjamina, E. Cassirera, do Auerbachove studije Filologija i svjetska književnost(1969, 11952) kontinuirano se obnavlja interes za metodološka, problemska i sadržajna pitanja filologije.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Sablasti filološkog zadatka. S onu stranu povratka filologiji

Vuković

2023

10.14746/pss

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper follows the numerous debates on the importance of philology that have started to emerge in the 1980s, beginning from Paul de Man's essay Return to Philology. The assumption is that despite obvious devaluation of its importance and institutional ruination, philology survives precisely because the idea of a return is inherent in it. However, as the return is in this context grasped as the return of the repressed, it is claimed that philology survives as a paradoxical discipline whose epistemological power seeks to be represented by the figure of a specter and within hauntology, as Derrida introduced it in his works. It is argued that philology today draws strength precisely from its openness to disciplinary hybridity, institutional uncertainty, and continuous rethinking of its own social role. In conclusion, the work of Vatroslav Jagić, one of the greatest Croatian philologists and world-renowned representative of Slavic philology, whose understanding of the task of philology relates to the theses presented in the paper, is included in the discussion and introduced in the dialogue.

show abstract

Edith Wharton’s Microscopist and the Science of Language

Coit

2020

The Palgrave Handbook of Twentieth and Twenty-First Century Literature and Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Many Returns of Philology: A State of the Field Report

Cited by 35 publications

References 8 publications

Acehnese Loanwords and Contact with Other World's Languages

Acehnese Loanwords and Contact with Other World's Languages

Sablasti filološkog zadatka. S onu stranu povratka filologiji

Edith Wharton’s Microscopist and the Science of Language

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About